PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBAL.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBAL.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) and CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBAL.TO achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than CRT-UN.TO's 11.59% return.


VBAL.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
0.77%
YTD
6.71%
6M
5.75%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*

CRT-UN.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.42%
YTD
11.59%
6M
15.18%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBAL.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VBAL.TO
Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio
6.71%11.92%14.62%12.49%-11.39%10.21%10.27%14.90%-2.52%
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
11.59%20.98%3.91%-0.26%-5.16%16.12%2.73%47.59%-11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between VBAL.TO and CRT-UN.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018

0.40

The correlation between VBAL.TO and CRT-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBAL.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBAL.TO
VBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CRT-UN.TO
CRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBAL.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) and CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBAL.TOCRT-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.22

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.63

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

6.86

+4.95

VBAL.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBAL.TO and CRT-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBAL.TOCRT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.29

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.40

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.54

+0.23

Drawdowns

VBAL.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.19%, smaller than the maximum CRT-UN.TO drawdown of -45.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBAL.TO and CRT-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBAL.TOCRT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.19%

-45.88%

+24.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-6.24%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.66%

-17.38%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.38%

-24.70%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-0.84%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-6.26%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.38%

-0.98%

Volatility

VBAL.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio (VBAL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) at 2.78%. This indicates that VBAL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBAL.TOCRT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

2.78%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

9.36%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

12.74%

-4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.67%

17.64%

-8.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.10%

20.22%

-10.12%

Dividends

VBAL.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

VBAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than CRT-UN.TO's 5.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
5.35%5.77%6.40%6.04%5.48%4.76%5.08%4.71%6.34%4.84%4.54%5.11%
VBAL.TO
Vanguard Balanced ETF Portfolio
2.09%2.23%2.30%2.37%2.21%1.95%1.82%2.25%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBAL.TO and CRT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBAL.TO and CRT-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer