VAW vs. VWO
VAW (Vanguard Materials ETF) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAW is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VAW returned 9.87%/yr vs 8.60%/yr for VWO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VAW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
VAW vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 9.87%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.
VAW
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
VWO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
VAW vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 9.07% | 12.30% | 0.48% | 13.67% | -11.80% | 27.43% | 19.44% | 23.53% | -17.49% | 23.76% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 8.50% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAW and VWO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005 | 0.71 |
The correlation between VAW and VWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VAW vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAW
VWO
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
VAW
VWO
Consumer Cyclical
VAW
VWO
Industrials
VAW
VWO
Energy
VAW
VWO
Healthcare
VAW
VWO
Technology
VAW
VWO
Consumer Defensive
VAW
VWO
Communication Services
VAW
-
VWO
Financial Services
VAW
-
VWO
Real Estate
VAW
-
VWO
Utilities
VAW
-
VWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAW vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
VAW
VWO
VAW vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VAW | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.28 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.18 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 7.79 | -3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAW | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.49 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.45 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.26 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
VAW vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAW | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.17% | -67.68% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -11.17% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.21% | -17.37% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -32.60% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.13% | -36.39% | -4.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | -4.67% | -2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -15.81% | +6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 3.12% | +1.02% |
Volatility
VAW vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) is 5.94%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that VAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAW | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 6.29% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 13.80% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.88% | 16.37% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 17.45% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 19.23% | +1.99% |
VAW vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAW vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than VWO's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAW and VWO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to VAW (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs VWO's -67.68%.
On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 9.87% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VAW has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAW.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.41% for VAW.
VAW is categorized as Materials, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAW and 0.08% for VWO.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VAW and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer