PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAW vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAW vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 9.87%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.


VAW

1D
-1.01%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
9.07%
6M
14.24%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
9.87%

VWO

1D
0.52%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
8.50%
6M
9.73%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
8.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAW vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
9.07%12.30%0.48%13.67%-11.80%27.43%19.44%23.53%-17.49%23.76%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
8.50%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VAW and VWO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005

0.71

The correlation between VAW and VWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VAW vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAW
VWO

Basic Materials

90.2%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
10.7%

Industrials

1.0%
8.0%

Energy

0.5%
4.6%

Healthcare

0.5%
3.9%

Technology

0.1%
29.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
3.7%

Communication Services

-

7.1%

Financial Services

-

19.5%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Basic Materials

VAW
90.2%
VWO
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VAW
8.3%
VWO
10.7%

Industrials

VAW
1.0%
VWO
8.0%

Energy

VAW
0.5%
VWO
4.6%

Healthcare

VAW
0.5%
VWO
3.9%

Technology

VAW
0.1%
VWO
29.6%

Consumer Defensive

VAW
0.0%
VWO
3.7%

Communication Services

VAW

-

VWO
7.1%

Financial Services

VAW

-

VWO
19.5%

Real Estate

VAW

-

VWO
2.2%

Utilities

VAW

-

VWO
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAW vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAW
VAW Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAW vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAWVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.18

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

7.79

-3.47

VAW vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAW and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VAWVWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

1.49

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.27

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.45

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.26

+0.12

Drawdowns

VAW vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAWVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.17%

-67.68%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-11.17%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.21%

-17.37%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-32.60%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

-36.39%

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.27%

-4.67%

-2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-15.81%

+6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

3.12%

+1.02%

Volatility

VAW vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) is 5.94%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that VAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAWVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

6.29%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

13.80%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.88%

16.37%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

17.45%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

19.23%

+1.99%

VAW vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAW vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than VWO's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
1.41%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.44%1.67%1.94%2.03%1.63%1.67%2.30%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAW and VWO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to VAW (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 9.87% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VAW has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAW.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.41% for VAW.

VAW is categorized as Materials, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAW and 0.08% for VWO.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAW and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer