VAW vs. VFH

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VAW (Vanguard Materials ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAW is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VAW returned 9.87%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for VFH. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VAW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.

Performance

VAW vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 9.87%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.

VAW

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -3.30%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 14.24%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: 10.82%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: 9.87%

VFH

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: -4.26%
• 6M: -1.64%
• 1Y: 4.15%
• 3Y*: 18.86%
• 5Y*: 8.65%
• 10Y*: 12.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAW vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF	9.07%	12.30%	0.48%	13.67%	-11.80%	27.43%	19.44%	23.53%	-17.49%	23.76%
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	-4.26%	14.91%	30.44%	14.17%	-12.31%	35.22%	-1.96%	31.57%	-13.52%	19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between VAW and VFH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between VAW and VFH has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VAW vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VAW	VFH
Basic Materials	90.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	0.0%
Industrials	1.0%	0.2%
Energy	0.5%	-
Healthcare	0.5%	0.1%
Technology	0.1%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Financial Services	-	96.8%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VAW vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAW

VAW Risk / Return Rank: 30
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 28
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 32

VFH

VFH Risk / Return Rank: 13
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 13
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAW vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VAW	VFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.28	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	0.48	+1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.06	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	0.28	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.32	0.74	+3.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VAW vs. VFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the VFH Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAW and VFH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VAW	VFH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	0.28	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.45	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.56	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.24	+0.14

Drawdowns

VAW vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	VAW	VFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.17%	-78.61%	+16.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.42%	-14.75%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.21%	-17.30%	-5.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.50%	-25.66%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.13%	-44.42%	+3.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.27%	-7.17%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.63%	-18.53%	+8.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	5.60%	-1.46%

Volatility

VAW vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 4.28%. This indicates that VAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VAW	VFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.94%	4.28%	+1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.18%	11.34%	+2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.88%	14.98%	+2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.65%	19.34%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.22%	22.56%	-1.34%

VAW vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VAW vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than VFH's 1.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF	1.41%	1.55%	1.70%	1.72%	1.98%	1.44%	1.67%	1.94%	2.03%	1.63%	1.67%	2.30%
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	1.53%	1.55%	1.75%	2.08%	2.31%	1.87%	2.21%	2.17%	2.30%	1.53%	1.63%	2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VAW and VFH in my portfolio?

VAW and VFH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VAW or VFH?

VAW has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to VFH (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs VFH's -78.61%.

Which ETF is better, VAW or VFH?

On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.59% vs 9.87% for VAW. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VAW or VFH?

Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VAW or VFH?

VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VAW or VFH?

VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.41% for VAW.

What is the main difference between VAW and VFH?

VAW is categorized as Materials, while VFH is Financials Equities. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAW and 0.09% for VFH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.