VAPX.L vs. VYM
VAPX.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAPX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VAPX.L returned 12.48%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for VYM. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VAPX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
VAPX.L vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VAPX.L is traded in GBP, while VYM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VYM values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAPX.L achieves a 40.82% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 11.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VAPX.L having a 12.48% annualized return and VYM not far behind at 12.44%.
VAPX.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 40.82%
- 6M
- 44.79%
- 1Y
- 72.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 26.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
VAPX.L vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 40.82% | 31.34% | -3.50% | 3.89% | -1.65% | 1.83% | 15.31% | 12.85% | -9.57% | 20.38% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 11.90% | 7.20% | 19.65% | 1.25% | 11.40% | 27.39% | -1.83% | 19.34% | -0.34% | 6.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAPX.L and VYM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013 | 0.43 |
The correlation between VAPX.L and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VAPX.L vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAPX.L
VYM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Technology
VAPX.L
VYM
Financial Services
VAPX.L
VYM
Industrials
VAPX.L
VYM
Basic Materials
VAPX.L
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
VAPX.L
VYM
Real Estate
VAPX.L
VYM
Healthcare
VAPX.L
VYM
Consumer Defensive
VAPX.L
VYM
Communication Services
VAPX.L
VYM
Energy
VAPX.L
VYM
Utilities
VAPX.L
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAPX.L vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
VAPX.L
VYM
VAPX.L vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VAPX.L | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.46 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.40 | 4.84 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.83 | 17.54 | +2.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAPX.L | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43 | 2.56 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.94 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.74 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.62 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
VAPX.L vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAPX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.88%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -38.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAPX.L and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAPX.L | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.88% | -38.23% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -5.40% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -17.47% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.55% | -17.47% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.88% | -27.08% | -3.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.79% | -0.98% | -7.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -5.31% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 1.49% | +2.17% |
Volatility
VAPX.L vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.76%. This indicates that VAPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAPX.L | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.60% | 2.76% | +8.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.95% | 7.66% | +11.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.14% | 10.20% | +10.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 13.44% | +2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 16.77% | +0.71% |
VAPX.L vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAPX.L vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than VYM's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.91% | 2.70% | 3.47% | 3.53% | 4.32% | 3.51% | 2.08% | 3.39% | 3.52% | 3.10% | 2.71% | 3.49% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.22% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAPX.L and VYM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VAPX.L.
VAPX.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VAPX.L and 0.04% for VYM.
Find the right allocation for VAPX.L and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer