PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAPX.L vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAPX.L vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VAPX.L is traded in GBP, while VTI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VTI values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAPX.L achieves a 40.82% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VAPX.L has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 12.48%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


VAPX.L

1D
0.30%
1M
0.03%
YTD
40.82%
6M
44.79%
1Y
72.72%
3Y*
22.66%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
12.48%

VTI

1D
0.27%
1M
2.61%
YTD
10.11%
6M
8.76%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAPX.L vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
40.82%31.34%-3.50%3.89%-1.65%1.83%15.31%12.85%-9.57%20.38%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.11%8.76%25.97%19.75%-9.95%26.87%17.52%25.70%0.38%10.73%

Correlation

The correlation between VAPX.L and VTI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2013

0.47

The correlation between VAPX.L and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (5 years) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VAPX.L vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAPX.L
VTI

Technology

30.2%
33.5%

Financial Services

25.3%
12.0%

Industrials

12.5%
9.8%

Basic Materials

9.5%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
10.0%

Real Estate

4.9%
2.4%

Healthcare

3.3%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
4.7%

Communication Services

2.4%
10.3%

Energy

2.3%
3.7%

Utilities

2.0%
2.3%

Technology

VAPX.L
30.2%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

VAPX.L
25.3%
VTI
12.0%

Industrials

VAPX.L
12.5%
VTI
9.8%

Basic Materials

VAPX.L
9.5%
VTI
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VAPX.L
5.3%
VTI
10.0%

Real Estate

VAPX.L
4.9%
VTI
2.4%

Healthcare

VAPX.L
3.3%
VTI
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

VAPX.L
2.5%
VTI
4.7%

Communication Services

VAPX.L
2.4%
VTI
10.3%

Energy

VAPX.L
2.3%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

VAPX.L
2.0%
VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAPX.L vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAPX.L
VAPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAPX.L vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAPX.LVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.43

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

3.65

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.83

14.08

+5.75

VAPX.L vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is higher than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAPX.L and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VAPX.LVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43

2.27

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.83

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.86

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.67

-0.14

Drawdowns

VAPX.L vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAPX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.88%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -34.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAPX.L and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAPX.LVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.88%

-34.91%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-7.35%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.81%

-22.54%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.55%

-22.54%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.88%

-27.22%

-3.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.79%

-1.80%

-6.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-4.95%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

1.90%

+1.76%

Volatility

VAPX.L vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.39%. This indicates that VAPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAPX.LVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.60%

3.39%

+8.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.95%

8.54%

+10.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.14%

11.81%

+9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.30%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.48%

18.30%

-0.82%

VAPX.L vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAPX.L vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than VTI's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
1.91%2.70%3.47%3.53%4.32%3.51%2.08%3.39%3.52%3.10%2.71%3.49%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAPX.L and VTI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VAPX.L.

VAPX.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VAPX.L and 0.03% for VTI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAPX.L and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer