VAPX.L vs. GPIX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VAPX.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAPX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. VAPX.L is passively managed, while GPIX is actively managed. Over the past year, VAPX.L returned 72.72% vs 24.67% for GPIX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VAPX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.

Performance

VAPX.L vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VAPX.L is traded in GBP, while GPIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GPIX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAPX.L achieves a 40.82% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 9.22% return.

VAPX.L

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 40.82%
• 6M: 44.79%
• 1Y: 72.72%
• 3Y*: 22.66%
• 5Y*: 11.85%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

GPIX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 9.22%
• 6M: 8.38%
• 1Y: 24.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAPX.L vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing	40.82%	31.34%	-3.50%	12.30%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	9.22%	7.96%	23.90%	8.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VAPX.L and GPIX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.32

VAPX.L vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VAPX.L	GPIX
Technology	30.2%	35.5%
Financial Services	25.3%	11.6%
Industrials	12.5%	8.4%
Basic Materials	9.5%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	10.1%
Real Estate	4.9%	2.0%
Healthcare	3.3%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	4.9%
Communication Services	2.4%	11.5%
Energy	2.3%	3.5%
Utilities	2.0%	2.4%

Return for Risk

VAPX.L vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAPX.L

VAPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
VAPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
VAPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
VAPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
VAPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 76
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAPX.L vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VAPX.L	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.43	2.42	+1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.10	3.16	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.47	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.40	4.18	+1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.83	17.18	+2.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VAPX.L vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is higher than the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAPX.L and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VAPX.L	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.43	2.42	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.36	-0.83

Drawdowns

VAPX.L vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAPX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.88%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -20.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAPX.L and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VAPX.L	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.88%	-20.68%	-10.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.41%	-5.92%	-7.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.79%	-1.30%	-7.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.31%	-2.65%	-3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	1.44%	+2.22%

Volatility

VAPX.L vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 2.77%. This indicates that VAPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VAPX.L	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.60%	2.77%	+8.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.95%	7.50%	+11.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.14%	10.25%	+10.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.22%	14.15%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	14.15%	+3.33%

VAPX.L vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

VAPX.L vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than GPIX's 8.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	8.13%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing	1.91%	2.70%	3.47%	3.53%	4.32%	3.51%	2.08%	3.39%	3.52%	3.10%	2.71%	3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VAPX.L and GPIX in my portfolio?

VAPX.L and GPIX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VAPX.L or GPIX?

On fees, VAPX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VAPX.L or GPIX?

VAPX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.

What is the main difference between VAPX.L and GPIX?

VAPX.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VAPX.L and 0.29% for GPIX.