PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALE vs. HYMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VALE vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vale S.A. (VALE) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALE achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly higher than HYMC's 10.77% return.


VALE

1D
-1.58%
1M
-9.86%
YTD
15.04%
6M
19.11%
1Y
66.24%
3Y*
10.73%
5Y*
1.65%
10Y*
20.98%

HYMC

1D
-0.38%
1M
-31.50%
YTD
10.77%
6M
133.42%
1Y
506.68%
3Y*
101.80%
5Y*
-6.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALE vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VALE
Vale S.A.
15.04%60.70%-38.83%1.57%32.54%-1.45%32.40%2.72%4.42%
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
10.77%975.57%-9.80%-53.96%-13.30%-92.18%-24.03%4.59%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VALE and HYMC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2018

0.21

Over the past year, VALE and HYMC have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VALE:

$64.08B

HYMC:

$2.36B

EPS

VALE:

$0.65

HYMC:

-$1.64

PB Ratio

VALE:

1.75

HYMC:

10.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

VALE:

$39.53B

HYMC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

VALE:

$13.65B

HYMC:

-$4.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

VALE:

$14.33B

HYMC:

-$69.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALE vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALE
VALE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VALE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VALE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMC
HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALE vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vale S.A. (VALE) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VALEHYMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

9.69

-6.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.56

22.66

-11.10

VALE vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALE Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 4.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALE and HYMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VALEHYMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

4.28

-2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

-0.04

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

-0.12

+0.42

Drawdowns

VALE vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALE drawdown since its inception was -92.78%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALE and HYMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALEHYMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.78%

-98.89%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.85%

-52.76%

+32.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.94%

-63.45%

+21.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.79%

-95.18%

+45.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.88%

-83.36%

+67.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.72%

-63.35%

+26.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

22.51%

-16.76%

Volatility

VALE vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vale S.A. (VALE) is 9.08%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 26.05%. This indicates that VALE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALEHYMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

26.05%

-16.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.61%

94.84%

-68.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.92%

119.54%

-87.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.45%

152.53%

-117.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.87%

123.03%

-82.16%

Dividends

VALE vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

VALE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VALE
Vale S.A.
3.83%7.29%11.41%7.75%8.63%19.70%2.72%2.63%4.16%3.77%1.06%7.48%

Financials

VALE vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vale S.A. and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
9.26B
0
(VALE) Total Revenue
(HYMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


VALE and HYMC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYMC has higher volatility (26.05%) compared to VALE (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VALE dropped -92.78% vs HYMC's -98.89%.

HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALE and HYMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer