PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V vs. NBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

V vs. NBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Visa Inc. (V) and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V achieves a -8.47% return, which is significantly lower than NBIX's 15.01% return. Over the past 10 years, V has outperformed NBIX with an annualized return of 15.64%, while NBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.92% annualized return.


V

1D
-1.21%
1M
0.48%
YTD
-8.47%
6M
-1.79%
1Y
-12.97%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
15.64%

NBIX

1D
-0.46%
1M
7.14%
YTD
15.01%
6M
5.25%
1Y
30.09%
3Y*
20.43%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
12.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V vs. NBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
V
Visa Inc.
-8.47%11.76%22.32%26.31%-3.40%-0.31%17.12%43.33%16.49%47.18%
NBIX
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
15.01%3.90%3.60%10.31%40.24%-11.14%-10.83%50.53%-7.96%100.49%

Correlation

The correlation between V and NBIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2008

0.32

The correlation between V and NBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

V:

$15.24

NBIX:

$6.53

PE Ratio

V:

20.98

NBIX:

24.97

PEG Ratio

V:

1.29

NBIX:

0.49

PS Ratio

V:

10.84

NBIX:

5.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

V:

$43.03B

NBIX:

$3.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

V:

$16.94B

NBIX:

$3.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

V:

$27.63B

NBIX:

$881.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V vs. NBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V
V Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
V Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
V Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
V Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

NBIX
NBIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V vs. NBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Visa Inc. (V) and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.20

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

1.45

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.18

3.18

-4.36

V vs. NBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the NBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V and NBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

0.97

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.33

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.33

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.14

+0.54

Drawdowns

V vs. NBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, smaller than the maximum NBIX drawdown of -97.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V and NBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-97.21%

+45.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.38%

-20.90%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.38%

-42.89%

+22.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.60%

-42.89%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.36%

-46.39%

+10.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.69%

-2.53%

-11.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-43.84%

+35.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.03%

9.49%

+1.54%

Volatility

V vs. NBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Visa Inc. (V) is 5.74%, while Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that V experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

10.20%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.50%

23.64%

-6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.32%

31.24%

-8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.80%

32.73%

-9.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.47%

39.15%

-14.68%

Dividends

V vs. NBIX - Dividend Comparison

V's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while NBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBIX
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
V
Visa Inc.
0.81%0.70%0.68%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%

Financials

V vs. NBIX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Visa Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
11.23B
814.50M
(V) Total Revenue
(NBIX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

V vs. NBIX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Visa Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
-79.3%
98.3%
Portfolio components
V - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a gross profit of -8.90B and revenue of 11.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -79.3%.

NBIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 800.70M and revenue of 814.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.3%.

V - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported an operating income of 7.23B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 64.4%.

NBIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 193.40M and revenue of 814.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.

V - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a net income of 6.02B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in a net margin of 53.6%.

NBIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. reported a net income of 197.90M and revenue of 814.50M, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


V and NBIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIX has higher volatility (10.20%) compared to V (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, V dropped -51.90% vs NBIX's -97.21%.

NBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V and NBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer