UUP vs. XYLD

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UUP is a Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UUP returned 3.19%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for XYLD. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. UUP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.

Performance

UUP vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UUP achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 4.47% return. Over the past 10 years, UUP has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 3.19%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.23% annualized return.

UUP

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 3.70%
• 6M: 3.08%
• 1Y: 5.64%
• 3Y*: 4.21%
• 5Y*: 6.04%
• 10Y*: 3.19%

XYLD

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 4.47%
• 6M: 5.83%
• 1Y: 16.60%
• 3Y*: 10.96%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: 8.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UUP vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	3.70%	-4.99%	13.50%	3.63%	9.46%	5.73%	-6.66%	4.09%	7.05%	-9.10%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	4.47%	8.02%	19.49%	11.10%	-12.05%	19.59%	-0.56%	21.41%	-6.09%	16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between UUP and XYLD is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013	-0.08

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between UUP and XYLD has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.08 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

UUP vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UUP	XYLD
Financial Services	97.4%	11.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Communication Services	-	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.9%
Energy	-	3.5%
Healthcare	-	8.5%
Industrials	-	8.3%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Technology	-	35.6%
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

UUP vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UUP

UUP Risk / Return Rank: 29
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 26
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 31

XYLD

XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 84
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UUP vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UUP	XYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	2.53	-1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	3.58	-2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.59	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	3.15	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.13	16.73	-12.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UUP vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UUP and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UUP	XYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	2.53	-1.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.68	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.58	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.60	-0.40

Drawdowns

UUP vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUP drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUP and XYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	UUP	XYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.19%	-33.46%	+11.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.65%	-5.29%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.05%	-15.53%	+5.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.37%	-18.66%	+8.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.24%	-33.46%	+19.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.89%	-0.64%	-2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.91%	-3.72%	-5.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	0.99%	+0.38%

Volatility

UUP vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) is 1.23%, while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that UUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UUP	XYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.23%	1.33%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.25%	5.46%	-1.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.09%	6.60%	-0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.22%	11.23%	-4.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.96%	14.21%	-7.25%

UUP vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

UUP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

UUP vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

UUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than XYLD's 10.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	3.31%	3.43%	4.48%	6.44%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	2.03%	1.08%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	10.57%	10.51%	11.54%	10.51%	13.43%	9.07%	7.93%	5.76%	7.12%	5.18%	3.23%	4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UUP and XYLD in my portfolio?

UUP and XYLD have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UUP or XYLD?

XYLD has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to UUP (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UUP dropped -22.19% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

Which ETF is better, UUP or XYLD?

On 10-year performance, XYLD leads with 8.23% vs 3.19% for UUP. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UUP or XYLD?

Over the 10-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 3.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UUP or XYLD?

XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UUP or XYLD?

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 3.31% for UUP.

What is the main difference between UUP and XYLD?

UUP is categorized as Currency, while XYLD is Derivative Income. UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UUP and 0.60% for XYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.