PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTIL.L vs. EMBE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTIL.L vs. EMBE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTIL.L achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly higher than EMBE.L's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, UTIL.L has outperformed EMBE.L with an annualized return of 10.84%, while EMBE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.91% annualized return.


UTIL.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
13.65%
6M
15.33%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
10.84%

EMBE.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
0.41%
6M
1.14%
1Y
8.54%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
0.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTIL.L vs. EMBE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
13.65%33.98%1.33%13.09%-6.77%8.27%11.82%29.32%3.36%9.29%
EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.41%10.99%4.00%7.66%-20.86%-3.27%3.35%12.27%-8.40%8.13%

Correlation

The correlation between UTIL.L and EMBE.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014

0.37

The correlation between UTIL.L and EMBE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UTIL.L vs. EMBE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UTIL.L
EMBE.L

Utilities

95.4%

-

Industrials

4.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-0.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

UTIL.L
95.4%
EMBE.L

-

Industrials

UTIL.L
4.6%
EMBE.L

-

Basic Materials

UTIL.L

-

EMBE.L

-

Communication Services

UTIL.L

-

EMBE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

UTIL.L

-

EMBE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

UTIL.L

-

EMBE.L

-

Energy

UTIL.L

-

EMBE.L

-

Financial Services

UTIL.L

-

EMBE.L
-0.3%

Healthcare

UTIL.L

-

EMBE.L

-

Real Estate

UTIL.L

-

EMBE.L

-

Technology

UTIL.L

-

EMBE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTIL.L vs. EMBE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

EMBE.L
EMBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EMBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTIL.L vs. EMBE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTIL.LEMBE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

1.86

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

7.12

+3.39

UTIL.L vs. EMBE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the EMBE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTIL.L and EMBE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTIL.LEMBE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.45

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

-0.07

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.10

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.23

+0.27

Drawdowns

UTIL.L vs. EMBE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTIL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than EMBE.L's maximum drawdown of -30.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIL.L and EMBE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTIL.LEMBE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-30.73%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-4.58%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-7.94%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-30.46%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-30.73%

-3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

-4.47%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-7.39%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.20%

+1.43%

Volatility

UTIL.L vs. EMBE.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) at 2.07%. This indicates that UTIL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMBE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTIL.LEMBE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

2.07%

+3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

4.85%

+8.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

5.89%

+9.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

8.89%

+7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

9.48%

+8.19%

UTIL.L vs. EMBE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTIL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EMBE.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTIL.L vs. EMBE.L - Dividend Comparison

UTIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMBE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.66%5.44%5.64%5.50%5.39%3.92%3.85%4.77%5.75%3.88%5.36%4.72%
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTIL.L and EMBE.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UTIL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTIL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMBE.L.

UTIL.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while EMBE.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while EMBE.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified Hedge TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UTIL.L and 0.50% for EMBE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTIL.L and EMBE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer