PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSC.L vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSC.L vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSC.L achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 66.10% return. Over the past 10 years, USSC.L has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 11.89%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.92% annualized return.


USSC.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.83%
YTD
13.11%
6M
13.79%
1Y
34.93%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
11.89%

SMH

1D
5.00%
1M
5.58%
YTD
66.10%
6M
62.81%
1Y
137.42%
3Y*
60.43%
5Y*
37.89%
10Y*
36.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSC.L vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USSC.L
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
13.11%14.72%8.33%23.18%-10.14%35.22%8.76%23.17%-15.30%9.80%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
66.10%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between USSC.L and SMH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2015

0.33

The correlation between USSC.L and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USSC.L vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USSC.L
SMH

Financial Services

19.8%

-

Industrials

14.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%

-

Energy

11.2%

-

Technology

9.4%
100.0%

Healthcare

7.5%

-

Real Estate

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

6.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.0%

-

Communication Services

2.7%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Financial Services

USSC.L
19.8%
SMH

-

Industrials

USSC.L
14.7%
SMH

-

Consumer Cyclical

USSC.L
14.0%
SMH

-

Energy

USSC.L
11.2%
SMH

-

Technology

USSC.L
9.4%
SMH
100.0%

Healthcare

USSC.L
7.5%
SMH

-

Real Estate

USSC.L
6.2%
SMH

-

Basic Materials

USSC.L
6.1%
SMH

-

Consumer Defensive

USSC.L
6.0%
SMH

-

Communication Services

USSC.L
2.7%
SMH

-

Utilities

USSC.L
2.5%
SMH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSC.L vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSC.L
USSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
USSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
USSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSC.L vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSC.LSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.62

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

9.26

-4.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

34.80

-21.09

USSC.L vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSC.L and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSC.LSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

4.27

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.08

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

1.13

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.33

+0.12

Drawdowns

USSC.L vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSC.L drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSC.L and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSC.LSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.99%

-84.96%

+35.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-14.93%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.47%

-35.74%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-45.30%

+17.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.99%

-45.30%

-3.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-6.23%

+5.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-41.07%

+33.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

3.96%

-1.42%

Volatility

USSC.L vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) is 3.91%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 15.45%. This indicates that USSC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSC.LSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

15.45%

-11.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

26.71%

-16.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

32.42%

-16.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.61%

35.32%

-13.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

32.75%

-9.96%

USSC.L vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

USSC.L vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

USSC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
USSC.L
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USSC.L and SMH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USSC.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USSC.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

USSC.L is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for USSC.L and 0.35% for SMH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSC.L and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer