PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSC.L vs. DTLA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSC.L vs. DTLA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSC.L achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly higher than DTLA.L's -1.94% return.


USSC.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.83%
YTD
13.11%
6M
13.79%
1Y
34.93%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
11.89%

DTLA.L

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-0.87%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
-1.76%
5Y*
-6.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSC.L vs. DTLA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
USSC.L
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
13.11%14.72%8.33%23.18%-10.14%35.22%8.76%23.17%-15.71%
DTLA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-1.94%4.49%-6.90%1.69%-30.29%-4.46%17.00%15.69%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between USSC.L and DTLA.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2018

-0.11

The correlation between USSC.L and DTLA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSC.L vs. DTLA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSC.L
USSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
USSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
USSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DTLA.L
DTLA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSC.L vs. DTLA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSC.LDTLA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.07

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

0.48

+3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

1.23

+12.47

USSC.L vs. DTLA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSC.L and DTLA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSC.LDTLA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

0.36

+1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

-0.44

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.08

+0.53

Drawdowns

USSC.L vs. DTLA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSC.L drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, roughly equal to the maximum DTLA.L drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSC.L and DTLA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSC.LDTLA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.99%

-48.41%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-7.50%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.47%

-18.57%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-42.80%

+15.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-41.04%

+40.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-24.04%

+16.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.94%

-0.40%

Volatility

USSC.L vs. DTLA.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) at 3.46%. This indicates that USSC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTLA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSC.LDTLA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

3.46%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

6.77%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

10.03%

+5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.61%

14.96%

+6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

14.80%

+7.99%

USSC.L vs. DTLA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DTLA.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

USSC.L vs. DTLA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither USSC.L nor DTLA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USSC.L and DTLA.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for USSC.L.

USSC.L is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while DTLA.L is Government Bonds. USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while DTLA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for USSC.L and 0.07% for DTLA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSC.L and DTLA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer