USMV vs. VONG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USMV returned 9.75%/yr vs 18.32%/yr for VONG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.

Performance

USMV vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 9.75%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.

USMV

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 2.27%
• 1Y: 3.18%
• 3Y*: 11.35%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

VONG

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.46%
• YTD: 4.12%
• 6M: 3.06%
• 1Y: 21.24%
• 3Y*: 23.77%
• 5Y*: 14.57%
• 10Y*: 18.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	1.55%	7.65%	15.74%	10.33%	-9.43%	20.85%	5.64%	27.69%	1.33%	18.91%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	4.12%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-1.53%	30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and VONG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between USMV and VONG has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

USMV vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USMV	VONG
Technology	30.8%	51.4%
Healthcare	12.5%	7.1%
Financial Services	12.4%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	10.0%	2.7%
Utilities	7.5%	0.3%
Communication Services	5.9%	13.2%
Industrials	5.7%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	13.2%
Energy	3.6%	0.4%
Basic Materials	2.2%	0.3%
Real Estate	2.2%	0.4%

Return for Risk

USMV vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV

USMV Risk / Return Rank: 15
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 14
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 17

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 37
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USMV	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.36	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.58	1.87	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.24	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	1.31	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.64	4.39	-2.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USMV vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USMV	VONG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	1.36	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.69	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.88	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.89	-0.03

Drawdowns

USMV vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, roughly equal to the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	USMV	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.10%	-32.72%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.46%	-16.23%	+9.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.36%	-23.27%	+13.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.93%	-32.72%	+14.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.10%	-32.72%	-0.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.24%	-4.47%	+2.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-4.88%	+2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	4.85%	-2.91%

Volatility

USMV vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.65%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USMV	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	4.78%	-2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.02%	12.08%	-6.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.57%	15.71%	-7.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.36%	21.38%	-9.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.51%	20.90%	-6.39%

USMV vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

USMV vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than VONG's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	1.54%	1.49%	1.67%	1.82%	1.62%	1.26%	1.81%	1.88%	2.12%	1.77%	2.22%	2.02%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.44%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USMV and VONG in my portfolio?

USMV and VONG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USMV or VONG?

VONG has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to USMV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs VONG's -32.72%.

Which ETF is better, USMV or VONG?

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.32% vs 9.75% for USMV. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USMV or VONG?

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USMV or VONG?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USMV or VONG?

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.44% for VONG.

What is the main difference between USMV and VONG?

USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.06% for VONG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.