USMV vs. MOOD
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Relative Sentiment. USMV is passively managed, while MOOD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USMV returned 11.35%/yr vs 19.89%/yr for MOOD. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MOOD.
Performance
USMV vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than MOOD's 12.64% return.
USMV
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
MOOD
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 12.64%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 33.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USMV vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.55% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | 4.50% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 12.64% | 30.39% | 12.53% | 12.56% | -2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and MOOD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USMV and MOOD has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USMV vs. MOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMV
MOOD
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
USMV
MOOD
Healthcare
USMV
MOOD
Financial Services
USMV
MOOD
Consumer Defensive
USMV
MOOD
Utilities
USMV
MOOD
Communication Services
USMV
MOOD
Industrials
USMV
MOOD
Consumer Cyclical
USMV
MOOD
Energy
USMV
MOOD
Basic Materials
USMV
MOOD
Real Estate
USMV
MOOD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
MOOD
USMV vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMV | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.46 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 3.45 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 10.67 | -9.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMV | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 2.34 | -1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.31 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
USMV vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and MOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -14.34% | -18.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -9.71% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | -9.71% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -2.14% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -2.32% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 3.13% | -1.19% |
Volatility
USMV vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.65%, while Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 3.59% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.02% | 12.55% | -6.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.57% | 14.33% | -5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 12.10% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 12.10% | +2.41% |
USMV vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MOOD's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMV vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than MOOD's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.34% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.54% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and MOOD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOOD has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to USMV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs MOOD's -14.34%.
On 3-year performance, MOOD leads with 19.89% vs 11.35% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 19.89% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOOD.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.
USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MOOD is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Relative Sentiment. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.68% for MOOD.
MOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMV and MOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer