PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMV vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMV vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 0.30% return.


USMV

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.28%
YTD
1.55%
6M
2.27%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
9.75%

GLDM

1D
0.25%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.30%
6M
3.19%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
30.08%
5Y*
17.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.55%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%-0.20%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.30%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and GLDM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.11

USMV vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMV
GLDM

Technology

30.8%

-

Healthcare

12.5%

-

Financial Services

12.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.0%

-

Utilities

7.5%

-

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Industrials

5.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

2.2%
100.0%

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Technology

USMV
30.8%
GLDM

-

Healthcare

USMV
12.5%
GLDM

-

Financial Services

USMV
12.4%
GLDM

-

Consumer Defensive

USMV
10.0%
GLDM

-

Utilities

USMV
7.5%
GLDM

-

Communication Services

USMV
5.9%
GLDM

-

Industrials

USMV
5.7%
GLDM

-

Consumer Cyclical

USMV
5.7%
GLDM

-

Energy

USMV
3.6%
GLDM

-

Basic Materials

USMV
2.2%
GLDM
100.0%

Real Estate

USMV
2.2%
GLDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMV vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USMVGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.23

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

1.53

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

3.85

-2.21

USMV vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USMVGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

1.15

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.00

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.99

-0.13

Drawdowns

USMV vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMVGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

-21.63%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-20.00%

+13.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

-20.00%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-20.92%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-19.80%

+17.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-6.24%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

7.96%

-6.02%

Volatility

USMV vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.65%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMVGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

5.65%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.02%

23.31%

-17.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.57%

26.65%

-18.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.36%

17.98%

-5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

16.89%

-2.38%

USMV vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USMV vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.54%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMV and GLDM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to USMV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.89% vs 7.21% for USMV. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USMV.

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GLDM is Gold. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.10% for GLDM.

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMV and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer