USMV vs. GLDM
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - USMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMV returned 7.21%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
USMV vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 0.30% return.
USMV
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.89%
- 10Y*
- —
USMV vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.55% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | -0.20% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.30% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and GLDM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.11 |
USMV vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMV
GLDM
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
USMV
GLDM
-
Healthcare
USMV
GLDM
-
Financial Services
USMV
GLDM
-
Consumer Defensive
USMV
GLDM
-
Utilities
USMV
GLDM
-
Communication Services
USMV
GLDM
-
Industrials
USMV
GLDM
-
Consumer Cyclical
USMV
GLDM
-
Energy
USMV
GLDM
-
Basic Materials
USMV
GLDM
Real Estate
USMV
GLDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
GLDM
USMV vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMV | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.23 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 1.53 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 3.85 | -2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMV | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 1.15 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.00 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.99 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
USMV vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -21.63% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -20.00% | +13.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | -20.00% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -20.92% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -19.80% | +17.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -6.24% | +3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 7.96% | -6.02% |
Volatility
USMV vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.65%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 5.65% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.02% | 23.31% | -17.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.57% | 26.65% | -18.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 17.98% | -5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 16.89% | -2.38% |
USMV vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USMV vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.54% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and GLDM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to USMV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs GLDM's -21.63%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.89% vs 7.21% for USMV. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USMV.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GLDM is Gold. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.10% for GLDM.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMV and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer