USMV vs. GFL
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while GFL (GFL Environmental Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, USMV returned 7.21%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for GFL. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
USMV vs. GFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than GFL's -18.68% return.
USMV
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
GFL
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -18.68%
- 6M
- -21.93%
- 1Y
- -29.67%
- 3Y*
- -2.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- —
USMV vs. GFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.55% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 7.18% |
GFL GFL Environmental Inc. | -18.68% | -3.44% | 29.26% | 18.24% | -22.65% | 29.88% | 67.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and GFL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.42 |
The correlation between USMV and GFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. GFL — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
GFL
USMV vs. GFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMV | GFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.80 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | -0.87 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | -1.94 | +3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMV | GFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | -1.17 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.06 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.38 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
USMV vs. GFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum GFL drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and GFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | GFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -42.76% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -34.20% | +27.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | -34.88% | +25.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -42.76% | +24.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -32.24% | +30.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -14.37% | +11.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 15.34% | -13.40% |
Volatility
USMV vs. GFL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.65%, while GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | GFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 7.69% | -5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.02% | 21.41% | -15.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.57% | 25.46% | -16.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 29.80% | -17.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 32.96% | -18.45% |
Dividends
USMV vs. GFL - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than GFL's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFL GFL Environmental Inc. | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.12% | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.54% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and GFL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFL has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to USMV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs GFL's -42.76%.
USMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMV and GFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer