USLM vs. FSG.L
USLM (United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.) and FSG.L (Foresight Group Holdings Limited) are both stocks. USLM operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials), while FSG.L operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, USLM returned 30.59%/yr vs 2.94%/yr for FSG.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
USLM vs. FSG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
USLM is traded in USD, while FSG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FSG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USLM achieves a -11.65% return, which is significantly lower than FSG.L's 0.73% return.
USLM
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- -11.65%
- 6M
- -12.38%
- 1Y
- -0.24%
- 3Y*
- 40.83%
- 5Y*
- 30.59%
- 10Y*
- 26.08%
FSG.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- —
USLM vs. FSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | -11.65% | -9.59% | 188.91% | 64.34% | 9.84% | 0.05% |
FSG.L Foresight Group Holdings Limited | 0.73% | 19.09% | -1.78% | 8.95% | -8.61% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between USLM and FSG.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
USLM:
$6.07
FSG.L:
£0.60
USLM:
17.42
FSG.L:
7.18
USLM:
0.45
FSG.L:
0.31
USLM:
6.17
FSG.L:
1.62
USLM:
$369.31M
FSG.L:
£309.00M
USLM:
$177.91M
FSG.L:
£284.24M
USLM:
$185.83M
FSG.L:
£99.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USLM vs. FSG.L — Risk / Return Rank
USLM
FSG.L
USLM vs. FSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) and Foresight Group Holdings Limited (FSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USLM | FSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.09 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 0.37 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.02 | 0.91 | -0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USLM | FSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 0.39 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.08 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.08 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
USLM vs. FSG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USLM drawdown since its inception was -77.09%, which is greater than FSG.L's maximum drawdown of -43.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLM and FSG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USLM | FSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.09% | -43.41% | -33.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.55% | -29.95% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.87% | -43.41% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.87% | -43.41% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.66% | -12.93% | -19.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.35% | -14.92% | -12.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.12% | 12.17% | -1.05% |
Volatility
USLM vs. FSG.L - Volatility Comparison
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Foresight Group Holdings Limited (FSG.L) at 7.93%. This indicates that USLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USLM | FSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.63% | 7.93% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.06% | 19.35% | +12.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.45% | 28.25% | +12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.91% | 38.89% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.37% | 38.67% | -2.30% |
Dividends
USLM vs. FSG.L - Dividend Comparison
USLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than FSG.L's 5.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSG.L Foresight Group Holdings Limited | 5.80% | 5.63% | 5.40% | 4.66% | 3.17% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | 0.23% | 0.20% | 0.15% | 0.35% | 0.57% | 0.50% | 0.56% | 6.52% | 0.76% | 0.70% | 0.66% | 0.91% |
Financials
USLM vs. FSG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and Foresight Group Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
USLM vs. FSG.L - Profitability Comparison
USLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.75M and revenue of 87.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.
FSG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Foresight Group Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 68.31M and revenue of 81.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.8%.
USLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.78M and revenue of 87.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.7%.
FSG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Foresight Group Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 22.48M and revenue of 81.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
USLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a net income of 30.58M and revenue of 87.83M, resulting in a net margin of 34.8%.
FSG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Foresight Group Holdings Limited reported a net income of 18.39M and revenue of 81.53M, resulting in a net margin of 22.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
USLM and FSG.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for USLM and FSG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer