PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USLM vs. ENEL.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

USLM vs. ENEL.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USLM is traded in USD, while ENEL.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENEL.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USLM achieves a -11.65% return, which is significantly lower than ENEL.MI's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, USLM has outperformed ENEL.MI with an annualized return of 26.08%, while ENEL.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.43% annualized return.


USLM

1D
1.01%
1M
-3.90%
YTD
-11.65%
6M
-12.38%
1Y
-0.24%
3Y*
40.83%
5Y*
30.59%
10Y*
26.08%

ENEL.MI

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
8.44%
6M
10.97%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
26.04%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USLM vs. ENEL.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
-11.65%-9.59%188.91%64.34%9.84%13.69%27.15%35.03%-7.26%2.47%
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
8.44%54.38%2.16%47.14%-27.94%-18.12%33.94%44.24%-1.88%45.52%

Correlation

The correlation between USLM and ENEL.MI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2007

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USLM vs. ENEL.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USLM
USLM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
USLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
USLM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
USLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
USLM Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ENEL.MI
ENEL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USLM vs. ENEL.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USLMENEL.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.26

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

2.31

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.02

6.53

-6.55

USLM vs. ENEL.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USLM Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USLM and ENEL.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USLMENEL.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

1.38

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.37

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.62

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.25

0.00

Drawdowns

USLM vs. ENEL.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USLM drawdown since its inception was -77.09%, which is greater than ENEL.MI's maximum drawdown of -62.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLM and ENEL.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USLMENEL.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.09%

-62.43%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.55%

-12.54%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.87%

-16.58%

-29.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.87%

-56.89%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.87%

-60.65%

+14.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.66%

-8.35%

-24.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.35%

-20.96%

-6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.12%

4.43%

+6.69%

Volatility

USLM vs. ENEL.MI - Volatility Comparison

United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) at 5.73%. This indicates that USLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENEL.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USLMENEL.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.63%

5.73%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.06%

18.51%

+13.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.45%

20.92%

+19.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.91%

23.87%

+12.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.37%

24.69%

+11.68%

Dividends

USLM vs. ENEL.MI - Dividend Comparison

USLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than ENEL.MI's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
5.00%4.98%5.44%5.56%7.55%5.08%3.96%3.96%4.70%3.51%3.82%3.60%
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
0.23%0.20%0.15%0.35%0.57%0.50%0.56%6.52%0.76%0.70%0.66%0.91%

Financials

USLM vs. ENEL.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and Enel SpA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. USLM values in USD, ENEL.MI values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


USLM and ENEL.MI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USLM and ENEL.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer