URNU.L vs. INRG.L
URNU.L (Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc) and INRG.L (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - URNU.L is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index, while INRG.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, URNU.L returned 35.39%/yr vs 5.89%/yr for INRG.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
URNU.L is traded in USD, while INRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URNU.L achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly lower than INRG.L's 29.72% return.
URNU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -17.50%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 48.14%
- 3Y*
- 35.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INRG.L
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 29.72%
- 6M
- 28.51%
- 1Y
- 67.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNU.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc | 8.71% | 70.50% | 1.19% | 39.91% | 3.95% |
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 29.72% | 44.28% | -25.89% | -19.97% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between URNU.L and INRG.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2022 | 0.44 |
The correlation between URNU.L and INRG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
URNU.L
INRG.L
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
URNU.L
INRG.L
Industrials
URNU.L
INRG.L
Utilities
URNU.L
INRG.L
Basic Materials
URNU.L
INRG.L
Technology
URNU.L
INRG.L
Communication Services
URNU.L
-
INRG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
URNU.L
-
INRG.L
Consumer Defensive
URNU.L
-
INRG.L
-
Financial Services
URNU.L
-
INRG.L
-
Healthcare
URNU.L
-
INRG.L
-
Real Estate
URNU.L
-
INRG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URNU.L vs. INRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
URNU.L
INRG.L
URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URNU.L | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 5.81 | -4.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 17.13 | -13.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URNU.L | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.61 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | -0.02 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URNU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.66%, smaller than the maximum INRG.L drawdown of -93.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNU.L and INRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URNU.L | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.66% | -93.70% | +55.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.08% | -11.52% | -21.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.66% | -44.14% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.80% | -73.12% | +50.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.36% | -81.16% | +69.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.83% | 3.91% | +9.92% |
Volatility
URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) at 11.19%. This indicates that URNU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URNU.L | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.01% | 11.19% | +4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.13% | 19.26% | +16.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.94% | 25.70% | +25.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.21% | 26.83% | +14.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.21% | 26.68% | +14.53% |
URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both URNU.L and INRG.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Dividend Comparison
URNU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INRG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.87% | 1.34% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.51% | 0.74% | 0.48% | 1.60% | 2.81% | 2.83% | 2.73% | 2.55% |
URNU.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URNU.L and INRG.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
URNU.L and INRG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
URNU.L is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while INRG.L is Energy Equities. URNU.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index, while INRG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.
Find the right allocation for URNU.L and INRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer