PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URNU.L vs. INRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

URNU.L is traded in USD, while INRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNU.L achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly lower than INRG.L's 29.72% return.


URNU.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
-17.50%
YTD
8.71%
6M
0.53%
1Y
48.14%
3Y*
35.39%
5Y*
10Y*

INRG.L

1D
-1.79%
1M
1.56%
YTD
29.72%
6M
28.51%
1Y
67.22%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*
11.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
URNU.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc
8.71%70.50%1.19%39.91%3.95%
INRG.L
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
29.72%44.28%-25.89%-19.97%2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between URNU.L and INRG.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2022

0.44

The correlation between URNU.L and INRG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
URNU.L
INRG.L

Energy

60.4%
25.8%

Industrials

25.4%
26.5%

Utilities

9.0%
33.6%

Basic Materials

4.3%
1.2%

Technology

0.9%
11.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

URNU.L
60.4%
INRG.L
25.8%

Industrials

URNU.L
25.4%
INRG.L
26.5%

Utilities

URNU.L
9.0%
INRG.L
33.6%

Basic Materials

URNU.L
4.3%
INRG.L
1.2%

Technology

URNU.L
0.9%
INRG.L
11.4%

Communication Services

URNU.L

-

INRG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

URNU.L

-

INRG.L
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

URNU.L

-

INRG.L

-

Financial Services

URNU.L

-

INRG.L

-

Healthcare

URNU.L

-

INRG.L

-

Real Estate

URNU.L

-

INRG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URNU.L vs. INRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNU.L
URNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
URNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
URNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

INRG.L
INRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
INRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
INRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
INRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
INRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URNU.LINRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.40

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

5.81

-4.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

17.13

-13.65

URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the INRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNU.L and INRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URNU.LINRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.61

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

-0.02

+0.76

Drawdowns

URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.66%, smaller than the maximum INRG.L drawdown of -93.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNU.L and INRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URNU.LINRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.66%

-93.70%

+55.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.08%

-11.52%

-21.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.66%

-44.14%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.80%

-73.12%

+50.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.36%

-81.16%

+69.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.83%

3.91%

+9.92%

Volatility

URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) at 11.19%. This indicates that URNU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URNU.LINRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.01%

11.19%

+4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.13%

19.26%

+16.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.94%

25.70%

+25.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.21%

26.83%

+14.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.21%

26.68%

+14.53%

URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both URNU.L and INRG.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

URNU.L vs. INRG.L - Dividend Comparison

URNU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INRG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INRG.L
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.87%1.34%1.24%0.80%0.51%0.74%0.48%1.60%2.81%2.83%2.73%2.55%
URNU.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


URNU.L and INRG.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

URNU.L and INRG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

URNU.L is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while INRG.L is Energy Equities. URNU.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index, while INRG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URNU.L and INRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer