URA vs. V
URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while V (Visa Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, URA returned 15.57%/yr vs 15.64%/yr for V. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
URA vs. V - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly higher than V's -8.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with URA having a 15.57% annualized return and V not far ahead at 15.64%.
URA
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -16.78%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 43.02%
- 3Y*
- 33.80%
- 5Y*
- 19.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
V
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- -8.47%
- 6M
- -1.79%
- 1Y
- -12.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
URA vs. V - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 7.47% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
V Visa Inc. | -8.47% | 11.76% | 22.32% | 26.31% | -3.40% | -0.31% | 17.12% | 43.33% | 16.49% | 47.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between URA and V is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between URA and V has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URA vs. V — Risk / Return Rank
URA
V
URA vs. V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Visa Inc. (V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URA | V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.91 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | -0.64 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.16 | -1.18 | +4.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URA | V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | -0.58 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.33 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.64 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.69 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
URA vs. V - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than V's maximum drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and V.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URA | V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -51.90% | -41.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.43% | -20.38% | -8.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.81% | -20.38% | -17.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.90% | -28.60% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.45% | -36.36% | -25.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.89% | -13.69% | -34.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.99% | -8.26% | -66.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.66% | 11.03% | +2.63% |
Volatility
URA vs. V - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 16.85% compared to Visa Inc. (V) at 5.74%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URA | V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.85% | 5.74% | +11.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.19% | 17.50% | +21.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.23% | 22.32% | +28.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.83% | 22.80% | +21.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.84% | 24.47% | +13.37% |
Dividends
URA vs. V - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than V's 0.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.54% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
V Visa Inc. | 0.81% | 0.70% | 0.68% | 0.72% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.56% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.61% | 0.75% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URA and V have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (16.85%) compared to V (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs V's -51.90%.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URA and V
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer