PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPWK vs. ARES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UPWK vs. ARES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Upwork Inc. (UPWK) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPWK achieves a -55.25% return, which is significantly lower than ARES's -20.44% return.


UPWK

1D
1.26%
1M
0.57%
YTD
-55.25%
6M
-55.38%
1Y
-42.40%
3Y*
1.43%
5Y*
-29.10%
10Y*

ARES

1D
0.97%
1M
0.49%
YTD
-20.44%
6M
-20.82%
1Y
-24.22%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
20.40%
10Y*
29.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPWK vs. ARES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UPWK
Upwork Inc.
-55.25%21.22%9.95%42.43%-69.44%-1.04%223.52%-41.08%-21.26%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
-20.44%-5.72%52.68%79.52%-12.75%77.75%37.37%110.13%-19.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UPWK and ARES is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018

0.36

The correlation between UPWK and ARES shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

UPWK:

$0.79

ARES:

$2.83

PE Ratio

UPWK:

11.27

ARES:

44.81

PEG Ratio

UPWK:

0.07

ARES:

1.79

PS Ratio

UPWK:

2.07

ARES:

4.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

UPWK:

$595.10M

ARES:

$6.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UPWK:

$612.97M

ARES:

$4.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

UPWK:

$152.42M

ARES:

$2.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPWK vs. ARES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPWK
UPWK Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
UPWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPWK Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UPWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPWK Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

ARES
ARES Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ARES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARES Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ARES Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARES Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPWK vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Upwork Inc. (UPWK) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UPWKARESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.92

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

-0.50

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.39

-0.98

-0.41

UPWK vs. ARES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPWK Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is comparable to the ARES Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPWK and ARES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UPWKARESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

-0.59

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

0.55

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.63

-0.80

Drawdowns

UPWK vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPWK drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, which is greater than ARES's maximum drawdown of -49.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPWK and ARES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPWKARESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.48%

-49.73%

-37.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.46%

-49.05%

-14.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.46%

-49.73%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.48%

-49.73%

-37.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.39%

-33.01%

-52.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.10%

-11.31%

-44.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.60%

24.72%

+5.88%

Volatility

UPWK vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison

Upwork Inc. (UPWK) has a higher volatility of 24.17% compared to Ares Management Corporation (ARES) at 11.35%. This indicates that UPWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPWKARESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.17%

11.35%

+12.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.03%

35.50%

+11.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.18%

41.16%

+18.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.40%

37.33%

+26.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.77%

36.69%

+28.08%

Dividends

UPWK vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison

UPWK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
4.38%3.29%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%5.65%4.32%6.81%
UPWK
Upwork Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UPWK vs. ARES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Upwork Inc. and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
23.00K
1.53B
(UPWK) Total Revenue
(ARES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UPWK and ARES have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPWK has higher volatility (24.17%) compared to ARES (11.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPWK dropped -87.48% vs ARES's -49.73%.

ARES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPWK and ARES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer