ULVR.L vs. PM
ULVR.L (Unilever PLC) and PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — ULVR.L in Household & Personal Products, PM in Tobacco. Over the past 10 years, ULVR.L returned 5.14%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for PM. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ULVR.L vs. PM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ULVR.L is traded in GBp, while PM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVR.L achieves a -12.27% return, which is significantly lower than PM's 13.27% return. Over the past 10 years, ULVR.L has underperformed PM with an annualized return of 5.14%, while PM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.
ULVR.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- -12.27%
- 6M
- -19.02%
- 1Y
- -16.95%
- 3Y*
- 1.32%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.14%
PM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.56%
- YTD
- 13.27%
- 6M
- 22.25%
- 1Y
- 3.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.54%
- 5Y*
- 19.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
ULVR.L vs. PM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVR.L Unilever PLC | -12.27% | -1.72% | 23.73% | -5.78% | 10.06% | -6.81% | 4.28% | 9.22% | 2.92% | 29.22% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 11.82% | 28.16% | 36.68% | -6.76% | 25.66% | 21.92% | 0.64% | 29.88% | -29.34% | 9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVR.L and PM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2008 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
ULVR.L:
£92.01B
PM:
$275.15B
ULVR.L:
£4.32
PM:
$7.12
ULVR.L:
9.70
PM:
24.74
ULVR.L:
1.77
PM:
2.69
ULVR.L:
1.02
PM:
6.62
ULVR.L:
£96.17B
PM:
$41.49B
ULVR.L:
£42.43B
PM:
$27.93B
ULVR.L:
£20.18B
PM:
$17.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVR.L vs. PM — Risk / Return Rank
ULVR.L
PM
ULVR.L vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unilever PLC (ULVR.L) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULVR.L | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.04 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.16 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 0.29 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULVR.L | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | 0.11 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.89 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.49 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.64 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
ULVR.L vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVR.L drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum PM drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVR.L and PM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVR.L | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -41.74% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.87% | -18.67% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -18.67% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.87% | -18.67% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.86% | -41.74% | +9.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.90% | -6.64% | -20.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -10.14% | +1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.62% | 10.35% | +4.27% |
Volatility
ULVR.L vs. PM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Unilever PLC (ULVR.L) is 5.98%, while Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a volatility of 10.39%. This indicates that ULVR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULVR.L | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 10.39% | -4.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.36% | 21.54% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.05% | 28.54% | -3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 22.31% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.53% | 24.66% | -4.13% |
Dividends
ULVR.L vs. PM - Dividend Comparison
ULVR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than PM's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.27% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
ULVR.L Unilever PLC | 4.04% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 3.95% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 3.31% | 3.26% | 3.24% | 2.95% | 3.17% | 2.98% |
Financials
ULVR.L vs. PM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Unilever PLC and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ULVR.L vs. PM - Profitability Comparison
ULVR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 20.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.91B and revenue of 10.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
ULVR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported an operating income of 4.16B and revenue of 20.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.
PM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.89B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.4%.
ULVR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported a net income of 2.58B and revenue of 20.35B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
PM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.44B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ULVR.L and PM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ULVR.L and PM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer