ULTA vs. EFR.TO
ULTA (Ulta Beauty, Inc.) and EFR.TO (Energy Fuels Inc.) are both stocks. ULTA operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while EFR.TO operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, ULTA returned 6.79%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for EFR.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ULTA vs. EFR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ULTA is traded in USD, while EFR.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the EFR.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULTA achieves a -23.51% return, which is significantly lower than EFR.TO's 4.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ULTA has underperformed EFR.TO with an annualized return of 6.79%, while EFR.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.77% annualized return.
ULTA
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -11.27%
- YTD
- -23.51%
- 6M
- -21.47%
- 1Y
- -0.61%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.79%
EFR.TO
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -28.98%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- -1.99%
- 1Y
- 178.04%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 17.47%
- 10Y*
- 19.77%
ULTA vs. EFR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULTA Ulta Beauty, Inc. | -23.51% | 39.11% | -11.24% | 4.46% | 13.76% | 43.59% | 13.44% | 3.39% | 9.47% | -12.27% |
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 4.83% | 181.88% | -28.28% | 16.13% | -18.42% | 78.98% | 123.03% | -33.16% | 57.96% | 9.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULTA and EFR.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2007 | 0.15 |
The correlation between ULTA and EFR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ULTA:
$20.35B
EFR.TO:
CA$5.13B
ULTA:
$26.57
EFR.TO:
-CA$0.30
ULTA:
1.63
EFR.TO:
58.41
ULTA:
7.88
EFR.TO:
7.09
ULTA:
$12.71B
EFR.TO:
CA$84.86M
ULTA:
$5.00B
EFR.TO:
CA$25.23M
ULTA:
$1.81B
EFR.TO:
-CA$72.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULTA vs. EFR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ULTA
EFR.TO
ULTA vs. EFR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULTA | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.30 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 3.49 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 6.96 | -7.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULTA | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 1.84 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.24 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.28 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | -0.09 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
ULTA vs. EFR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULTA drawdown since its inception was -87.89%, smaller than the maximum EFR.TO drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTA and EFR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULTA | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.89% | -99.64% | +11.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.56% | -51.27% | +16.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.56% | -61.46% | +16.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.56% | -68.95% | +24.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.92% | -79.41% | +14.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.52% | -93.53% | +59.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.80% | -91.24% | +70.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.51% | 25.68% | -12.17% |
Volatility
ULTA vs. EFR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) is 9.07%, while Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) has a volatility of 27.40%. This indicates that ULTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULTA | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 27.40% | -18.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.67% | 65.58% | -37.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.25% | 97.50% | -64.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.25% | 71.92% | -37.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.32% | 71.20% | -32.88% |
Dividends
ULTA vs. EFR.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ULTA nor EFR.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ULTA vs. EFR.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Energy Fuels Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ULTA vs. EFR.TO - Profitability Comparison
ULTA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 3.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.
EFR.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.36M and revenue of 35.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.
ULTA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 448.26M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
EFR.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -14.55M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.6%.
ULTA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 340.47M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
EFR.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -10.84M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ULTA and EFR.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ULTA and EFR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer