UL vs. ABDN.L
UL (The Unilever Group) and ABDN.L (Abrdn plc) are both stocks. UL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while ABDN.L operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, UL returned 4.43%/yr vs 2.69%/yr for ABDN.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UL vs. ABDN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UL is traded in USD, while ABDN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ABDN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a -12.75% return, which is significantly lower than ABDN.L's 18.13% return. Over the past 10 years, UL has outperformed ABDN.L with an annualized return of 4.43%, while ABDN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.69% annualized return.
UL
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- -12.75%
- 6M
- -8.37%
- 1Y
- -18.21%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
ABDN.L
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 25.17%
- 1Y
- 36.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
UL vs. ABDN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UL The Unilever Group | -12.75% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 9.04% | 12.88% | -2.34% | 40.15% |
ABDN.L Abrdn plc | 18.13% | 69.86% | -14.29% | 7.49% | -23.98% | -10.58% | -2.46% | 44.40% | -48.08% | 36.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between UL and ABDN.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UL and ABDN.L has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
UL:
$5.06
ABDN.L:
£0.70
UL:
11.08
ABDN.L:
3.39
UL:
2.17
ABDN.L:
0.00
UL:
1.20
ABDN.L:
0.67
UL:
$109.27B
ABDN.L:
£3.20B
UL:
$90.89B
ABDN.L:
£3.05B
UL:
$24.12B
ABDN.L:
£796.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UL vs. ABDN.L — Risk / Return Rank
UL
ABDN.L
UL vs. ABDN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Unilever Group (UL) and Abrdn plc (ABDN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UL | ABDN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.23 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 2.19 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 6.81 | -8.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UL | ABDN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.86 | 1.23 | -2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.11 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.07 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.02 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
UL vs. ABDN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum ABDN.L drawdown of -73.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and ABDN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UL | ABDN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.55% | -73.92% | +20.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.09% | -16.65% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.09% | -39.30% | +14.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.53% | -61.23% | +34.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.13% | -70.03% | +39.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.50% | -23.97% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.60% | -37.49% | +26.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.93% | 5.36% | +6.57% |
Volatility
UL vs. ABDN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Unilever Group (UL) is 5.63%, while Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that UL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABDN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UL | ABDN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 8.19% | -2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.17% | 24.67% | -6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 29.76% | -8.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 35.37% | -14.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 36.99% | -15.37% |
Dividends
UL vs. ABDN.L - Dividend Comparison
UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than ABDN.L's 6.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABDN.L Abrdn plc | 6.18% | 7.10% | 10.34% | 8.17% | 7.71% | 6.06% | 7.68% | 6.58% | 10.54% | 5.33% | 5.78% | 5.12% |
UL The Unilever Group | 4.07% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Financials
UL vs. ABDN.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Unilever Group and Abrdn plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UL and ABDN.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for UL and ABDN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer