UFPT vs. VRT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

UFPT (UFP Technologies, Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. UFPT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, UFPT returned 31.64%/yr vs 62.98%/yr for VRT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UFPT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFPT achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 85.57% return.

UFPT

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 5.06%
• 1Y: -4.53%
• 3Y*: 10.66%
• 5Y*: 31.64%
• 10Y*: 26.04%

VRT

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -11.59%
• YTD: 85.57%
• 6M: 61.97%
• 1Y: 160.87%
• 3Y*: 142.34%
• 5Y*: 62.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFPT vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
UFPT UFP Technologies, Inc.	2.11%	-9.19%	42.12%	45.93%	67.79%	50.77%	-6.07%	65.15%	-8.55%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	85.57%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between UFPT and VRT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018	0.23

The correlation between UFPT and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap UFPT : $1.77B VRT : $117.86B
EPS UFPT : $8.81 VRT : $3.99
PE Ratio UFPT : 25.73 VRT : 75.41
PEG Ratio UFPT : 0.48 VRT : 0.33
PS Ratio UFPT : 2.90 VRT : 10.84
PB Ratio UFPT : 4.03 VRT : 27.77
Total Revenue (TTM) UFPT : $608.85M VRT : $10.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) UFPT : $172.62M VRT : $3.92B
EBITDA (TTM) UFPT : $111.39M VRT : $2.35B

Return for Risk

UFPT vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFPT

UFPT Risk / Return Rank: 37
UFPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
UFPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
UFPT Omega Ratio Rank: 35
UFPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
UFPT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 93
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFPT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UFPT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	2.79	-2.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	3.30	-3.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.41	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	6.53	-6.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.27	18.20	-18.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UFPT vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFPT and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UFPT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10	2.79	-2.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	1.03	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	1.00	-0.84

Drawdowns

UFPT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFPT drawdown since its inception was -88.53%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFPT and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UFPT	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.53%	-71.24%	-17.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.69%	-24.78%	-5.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.31%	-61.28%	+12.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.31%	-71.24%	+22.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.75%	-20.11%	-16.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.24%	-16.22%	-16.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.77%	8.89%	+7.88%

Volatility

UFPT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) is 9.41%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that UFPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UFPT	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.41%	16.60%	-7.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.26%	45.55%	-15.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.47%	58.11%	-14.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.22%	61.81%	-17.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.62%	54.61%	-14.99%

Dividends

UFPT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

UFPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
UFPT UFP Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.07%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

UFPT vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UFP Technologies, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

UFPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.36M and revenue of 154.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

UFPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.37M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

UFPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 17.50M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UFPT and VRT in my portfolio?

UFPT and VRT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UFPT or VRT?

VRT has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to UFPT (9.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFPT dropped -88.53% vs VRT's -71.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.