PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UC15.L vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UC15.L vs. VT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC15.L returned 9.48%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for VT. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UC15.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

UC15.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UC15.L is traded in GBp, while VT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC15.L achieves a 21.92% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, UC15.L has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 9.48%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.36% annualized return.

UC15.L

1D
1.03%
1M
0.80%
YTD
21.92%
6M
21.98%
1Y
30.79%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*
9.48%

VT

1D
0.49%
1M
1.70%
YTD
10.84%
6M
10.41%
1Y
27.19%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC15.L vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC15.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc		21.92%2.29%6.44%-6.52%29.97%36.11%-2.49%5.31%-5.75%-2.28%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF		10.84%13.71%18.53%15.92%-8.25%19.39%13.16%21.99%-4.41%13.73%

Correlation

The correlation between UC15.L and VT is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2010

0.30

The correlation between UC15.L and VT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UC15.L vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UC15.L
VT

Technology

31.0%
27.8%

Communication Services

15.0%
8.3%

Energy

14.2%
4.3%

Financial Services

10.9%
15.9%

Healthcare

9.8%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
9.5%

Industrials

6.6%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.8%

Utilities

1.1%
2.7%

Basic Materials

0.5%
4.2%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

UC15.L
31.0%
VT
27.8%

Communication Services

UC15.L
15.0%
VT
8.3%

Energy

UC15.L
14.2%
VT
4.3%

Financial Services

UC15.L
10.9%
VT
15.9%

Healthcare

UC15.L
9.8%
VT
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

UC15.L
7.3%
VT
9.5%

Industrials

UC15.L
6.6%
VT
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

UC15.L
3.7%
VT
4.8%

Utilities

UC15.L
1.1%
VT
2.7%

Basic Materials

UC15.L
0.5%
VT
4.2%

Real Estate

UC15.L

-

VT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

Often compared with UC15.L:
UC15.L vs. SGLN.LUC15.L vs. CMFP.LUC15.L vs. VUSA.LUC15.L vs. ENCG.LUC15.L vs. COMTUC15.L vs. XBCU.LUC15.L vs. GDIG.L
Often compared with VT:
VT vs. VOOVT vs. VTIVT vs. VXUSVT vs. SPYVT vs. ACWIVT vs. VWRA.LVT vs. VWCE.DE

Return for Risk

UC15.L vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UC15.L
UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC15.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UC15.LVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.18
2.36

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.89
3.08

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

3.62

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.45

14.89

-1.44

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC15.L vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC15.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC15.L and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UC15.LVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.36

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.84

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.81

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.60

-0.58

Drawdowns

UC15.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC15.L drawdown since its inception was -98.86%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC15.L and VT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UC15.LVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.86%

-31.81%

-67.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-7.55%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-17.91%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-17.91%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.26%

-26.93%

-3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-2.16%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.24%

-4.54%

-12.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.83%

+0.45%

Volatility

UC15.L vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.78%. This indicates that UC15.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UC15.LVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

3.78%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

9.00%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

11.59%

+2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

14.16%

+5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

16.56%

+0.81%

UC15.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC15.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

UC15.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

UC15.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UC15.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF		1.63%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

UC15.L and VT have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.

UC15.L is categorized as Commodities, while VT is Global Equities. UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UC15.L and 0.06% for VT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC15.L and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer