PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBUT.DE vs. PQVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBUT.DE vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUT.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UBUT.DE is traded in EUR, while PQVG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PQVG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBUT.DE achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than PQVG.L's 18.31% return.


UBUT.DE

1D
-0.31%
1M
3.96%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.86%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
15.92%

PQVG.L

1D
0.21%
1M
5.14%
YTD
18.31%
6M
19.53%
1Y
20.93%
3Y*
20.88%
5Y*
16.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBUT.DE vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBUT.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
10.28%4.94%28.23%31.58%-19.43%39.75%10.58%41.48%1.10%7.76%
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
18.31%0.32%38.68%3.12%6.74%36.09%-1.23%28.87%-3.19%-13.80%

Correlation

The correlation between UBUT.DE and PQVG.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2017

0.74

The correlation between UBUT.DE and PQVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBUT.DE vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBUT.DE
UBUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PQVG.L
PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBUT.DE vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUT.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBUT.DEPQVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

5.46

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

14.56

-5.05

UBUT.DE vs. PQVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBUT.DE and PQVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBUT.DEPQVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.94

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

1.06

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.61

+0.29

Drawdowns

UBUT.DE vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.49%, smaller than the maximum PQVG.L drawdown of -33.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBUT.DE and PQVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBUT.DEPQVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.49%

-33.27%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-3.82%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-19.82%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.78%

-19.82%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

0.00%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-7.18%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.36%

+1.26%

Volatility

UBUT.DE vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUT.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) at 2.33%. This indicates that UBUT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBUT.DEPQVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

2.33%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

7.91%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.26%

10.75%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

15.67%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

18.51%

-1.49%

UBUT.DE vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBUT.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBUT.DE vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison

UBUT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than PQVG.L's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
0.77%0.83%0.82%1.61%1.77%0.88%1.59%1.41%1.30%0.72%0.00%
UBUT.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.41%0.47%0.65%0.84%0.84%0.74%1.00%0.74%1.28%0.95%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBUT.DE and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UBUT.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UBUT.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.

UBUT.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PQVG.L is S&P 500. UBUT.DE tracks MSCI USA Quality, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UBUT.DE and 0.35% for PQVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBUT.DE and PQVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer