PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXRH vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TXRH vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXRH achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 26.66% return. Over the past 10 years, TXRH has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 15.77%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 20.49% annualized return.


TXRH

1D
-1.57%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
1.95%
6M
2.54%
1Y
-12.60%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
15.77%

MAR

1D
-0.28%
1M
11.05%
YTD
26.66%
6M
36.53%
1Y
48.66%
3Y*
31.04%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
20.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXRH vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.95%-6.57%49.78%37.15%4.16%15.71%39.83%-3.62%15.11%11.16%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
26.66%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TXRH and MAR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004

0.44

Fundamentals

EPS

TXRH:

$6.26

MAR:

$12.66

PE Ratio

TXRH:

26.81

MAR:

30.92

PEG Ratio

TXRH:

1.67

MAR:

0.81

PS Ratio

TXRH:

1.84

MAR:

3.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

TXRH:

$6.06B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TXRH:

$1.14B

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

TXRH:

$701.29M

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXRH vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXRH
TXRH Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TXRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXRH Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TXRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXRH Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXRH vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TXRHMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.32

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

3.87

-4.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

9.70

-10.82

TXRH vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXRH Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXRH and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TXRHMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

1.87

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.81

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.63

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.47

-0.06

Drawdowns

TXRH vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXRH drawdown since its inception was -76.59%, roughly equal to the maximum MAR drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXRH and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXRHMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.59%

-75.59%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.61%

-12.65%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.82%

-30.50%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.45%

-30.50%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.04%

-61.26%

+3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.01%

-0.28%

-15.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-14.91%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.36%

5.03%

+6.33%

Volatility

TXRH vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) has a higher volatility of 15.63% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 6.25%. This indicates that TXRH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXRHMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.63%

6.25%

+9.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.41%

19.86%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.32%

26.15%

+3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.59%

28.82%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.62%

32.89%

+2.73%

Dividends

TXRH vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

TXRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than MAR's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.70%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.70%1.64%1.35%1.80%2.02%1.34%0.46%2.13%1.68%1.59%1.58%1.90%

Financials

TXRH vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
1.63B
1.81B
(TXRH) Total Revenue
(MAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TXRH and MAR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TXRH has higher volatility (15.63%) compared to MAR (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXRH dropped -76.59% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXRH and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer