PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TVE.TO vs. CLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TVE.TO vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. (TVE.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TVE.TO is traded in CAD, while CLS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TVE.TO achieves a 74.07% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 33.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TVE.TO has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 15.03%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 44.47% annualized return.


TVE.TO

1D
4.06%
1M
14.47%
YTD
74.07%
6M
74.35%
1Y
209.16%
3Y*
64.95%
5Y*
42.99%
10Y*
15.03%

CLS

1D
4.27%
1M
5.05%
YTD
33.13%
6M
14.32%
1Y
226.64%
3Y*
213.99%
5Y*
120.95%
10Y*
44.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TVE.TO vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TVE.TO
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
74.07%71.65%62.29%-28.32%18.84%203.15%-36.50%-15.25%-17.48%-17.34%
CLS
Celestica Inc.
33.13%205.65%241.92%153.62%7.67%37.85%-4.73%-9.59%-9.28%-17.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TVE.TO and CLS is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2008

0.18

The correlation between TVE.TO and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TVE.TO:

CA$6.78B

CLS:

$44.72B

EPS

TVE.TO:

-CA$0.19

CLS:

$8.28

PS Ratio

TVE.TO:

4.78

CLS:

3.24

PB Ratio

TVE.TO:

3.84

CLS:

21.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

TVE.TO:

CA$1.44B

CLS:

$13.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TVE.TO:

CA$560.03M

CLS:

$1.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

TVE.TO:

CA$596.84M

CLS:

$1.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TVE.TO vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TVE.TO
TVE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TVE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TVE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TVE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TVE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TVE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS
CLS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TVE.TO vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. (TVE.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TVE.TOCLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.40

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.09

7.27

+13.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

69.24

17.89

+51.35

TVE.TO vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TVE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 6.00, which is higher than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TVE.TO and CLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TVE.TOCLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.00

3.16

+2.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

2.10

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.89

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.31

-0.23

Drawdowns

TVE.TO vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TVE.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.30%, which is greater than CLS's maximum drawdown of -87.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TVE.TO and CLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TVE.TOCLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.30%

-87.69%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-31.40%

+21.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-54.77%

+19.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.72%

-54.77%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.68%

-79.60%

-12.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-17.56%

+16.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.19%

-50.32%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

12.73%

-9.69%

Volatility

TVE.TO vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. (TVE.TO) is 14.15%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 26.44%. This indicates that TVE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TVE.TOCLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.15%

26.44%

-12.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.91%

55.02%

-26.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.14%

72.42%

-37.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.69%

57.95%

-14.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.95%

50.19%

+2.76%

Dividends

TVE.TO vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

TVE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TVE.TO
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
0.94%1.93%3.15%4.90%2.63%

Financials

TVE.TO vs. CLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
375.55M
4.05B
(TVE.TO) Total Revenue
(CLS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TVE.TO values in CAD, CLS values in USD

TVE.TO vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
48.7%
10.8%
Portfolio components
TVE.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. reported a gross profit of 182.80M and revenue of 375.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

TVE.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. reported an operating income of 163.31M and revenue of 375.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 43.5%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

TVE.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. reported a net income of 5.65M and revenue of 375.55M, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TVE.TO and CLS have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TVE.TO and CLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer