PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTD vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTD vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTD achieves a -48.81% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 240.32% return.


TTD

1D
-2.61%
1M
-15.81%
YTD
-48.81%
6M
-50.62%
1Y
-72.81%
3Y*
-36.13%
5Y*
-19.79%
10Y*

MRVL

1D
9.63%
1M
69.78%
YTD
240.32%
6M
214.35%
1Y
323.75%
3Y*
69.41%
5Y*
42.37%
10Y*
41.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTD vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTD
The Trade Desk, Inc.
-48.81%-67.70%63.33%60.52%-51.08%14.41%208.34%123.83%153.79%65.27%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
240.32%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TTD and MRVL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2016

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between TTD and MRVL has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TTD:

$9.27B

MRVL:

$258.03B

EPS

TTD:

$0.89

MRVL:

$2.90

PE Ratio

TTD:

21.88

MRVL:

99.74

PEG Ratio

TTD:

0.29

MRVL:

0.18

PS Ratio

TTD:

3.19

MRVL:

28.91

PB Ratio

TTD:

3.78

MRVL:

14.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTD:

$2.97B

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTD:

$2.31B

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

TTD:

$725.01M

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTD vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTD
TTD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTD Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTD vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTDMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

1.59

-0.88

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

12.37

-13.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

28.64

-29.94

TTD vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTD Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTD and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTDMRVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.14

4.70

-5.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.69

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.23

+0.08

Drawdowns

TTD vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTD drawdown since its inception was -86.07%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTD and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTDMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.07%

-91.60%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.35%

-26.36%

-51.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.07%

-60.79%

-25.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.07%

-61.88%

-24.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.07%

-8.72%

-77.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.19%

-46.77%

+19.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.98%

11.37%

+44.61%

Volatility

TTD vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) is 19.61%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 38.50%. This indicates that TTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTDMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.61%

38.50%

-18.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.01%

54.32%

-13.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.21%

69.56%

-5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.36%

61.51%

+5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.47%

51.77%

+16.70%

Dividends

TTD vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

TTD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.08%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%
TTD
The Trade Desk, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TTD vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Trade Desk, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
688.86M
2.42B
(TTD) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TTD vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Trade Desk, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
73.6%
52.2%
Portfolio components
TTD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported a gross profit of 506.89M and revenue of 688.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.6%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

TTD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported an operating income of 66.65M and revenue of 688.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

TTD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported a net income of 40.00M and revenue of 688.86M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTD and MRVL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (38.50%) compared to TTD (19.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTD dropped -86.07% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTD and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer