PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTD vs. AEVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTD vs. AEVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTD achieves a -48.81% return, which is significantly lower than AEVA's 73.87% return.


TTD

1D
-2.61%
1M
-15.81%
YTD
-48.81%
6M
-50.62%
1Y
-72.81%
3Y*
-36.13%
5Y*
-19.79%
10Y*

AEVA

1D
0.35%
1M
70.15%
YTD
73.87%
6M
53.02%
1Y
10.48%
3Y*
49.22%
5Y*
-16.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTD vs. AEVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TTD
The Trade Desk, Inc.
-48.81%-67.70%63.33%60.52%-51.08%14.41%200.11%
AEVA
Aeva Technologies, Inc.
73.87%179.58%25.38%-44.29%-82.01%-48.01%51.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TTD and AEVA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between TTD and AEVA has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TTD:

$9.27B

AEVA:

$1.45B

EPS

TTD:

$0.89

AEVA:

-$2.52

PS Ratio

TTD:

3.19

AEVA:

63.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTD:

$2.97B

AEVA:

$20.97M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTD:

$2.31B

AEVA:

$971.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

TTD:

$725.01M

AEVA:

$21.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTD vs. AEVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTD
TTD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTD Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

AEVA
AEVA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AEVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AEVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEVA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTD vs. AEVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTDAEVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

1.12

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

0.14

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

0.19

-1.49

TTD vs. AEVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTD Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the AEVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTD and AEVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTDAEVADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.14

0.09

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

-0.17

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.12

+0.44

Drawdowns

TTD vs. AEVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTD drawdown since its inception was -86.07%, smaller than the maximum AEVA drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTD and AEVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTDAEVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.07%

-97.71%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.35%

-75.68%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.07%

-75.68%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.07%

-96.02%

+9.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.07%

-76.91%

-9.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.19%

-70.68%

+43.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.98%

55.91%

+0.07%

Volatility

TTD vs. AEVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) is 19.61%, while Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) has a volatility of 39.11%. This indicates that TTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTDAEVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.61%

39.11%

-19.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.01%

78.74%

-37.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.21%

114.82%

-50.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.36%

97.00%

-29.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.47%

91.35%

-22.88%

Dividends

TTD vs. AEVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTD nor AEVA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TTD vs. AEVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Trade Desk, Inc. and Aeva Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
688.86M
6.26M
(TTD) Total Revenue
(AEVA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TTD and AEVA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEVA has higher volatility (39.11%) compared to TTD (19.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTD dropped -86.07% vs AEVA's -97.71%.

AEVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTD and AEVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer