PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLX vs. RQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TSLX vs. RQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLX achieves a -18.90% return, which is significantly lower than RQI's 20.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TSLX has outperformed RQI with an annualized return of 11.45%, while RQI has yielded a comparatively lower 8.63% annualized return.


TSLX

1D
-1.38%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
-18.90%
6M
-19.48%
1Y
-19.78%
3Y*
6.57%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
11.45%

RQI

1D
-2.07%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
20.21%
6M
20.31%
1Y
16.20%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLX vs. RQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
-18.90%11.52%8.83%35.29%-16.37%32.33%9.77%29.62%0.36%15.47%
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
20.21%2.07%8.04%15.74%-31.07%56.64%-9.28%54.62%-11.11%11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLX and RQI is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014

0.32

The correlation between TSLX and RQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TSLX:

$1.62B

RQI:

$1.78B

EPS

TSLX:

$436.19

RQI:

$1.09

PE Ratio

TSLX:

0.04

RQI:

12.21

PS Ratio

TSLX:

0.02

RQI:

4.95

PB Ratio

TSLX:

0.00

RQI:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

TSLX:

$91.48B

RQI:

$360.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TSLX:

$215.15M

RQI:

$283.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

TSLX:

$192.45M

RQI:

$130.74M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLX vs. RQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLX
TSLX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

RQI
RQI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLX vs. RQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLXRQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.19

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

1.39

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

4.12

-5.46

TSLX vs. RQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLX Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the RQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLX and RQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLXRQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

1.07

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.19

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.32

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.28

+0.23

Drawdowns

TSLX vs. RQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLX drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum RQI drawdown of -91.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLX and RQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLXRQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-91.59%

+41.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.94%

-11.74%

-16.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.94%

-22.43%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.77%

-41.06%

+12.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

-59.12%

+8.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.75%

-2.07%

-24.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.08%

-17.92%

+8.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.69%

3.94%

+10.75%

Volatility

TSLX vs. RQI - Volatility Comparison

Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) at 4.95%. This indicates that TSLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLXRQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

4.95%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.68%

11.95%

+8.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.64%

15.23%

+9.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.40%

22.99%

-3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.47%

26.95%

-5.48%

Dividends

TSLX vs. RQI - Dividend Comparison

TSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%, more than RQI's 8.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
8.60%9.54%7.84%7.84%10.41%5.27%7.74%6.79%9.27%7.59%7.86%7.86%
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
11.25%9.44%9.81%9.72%10.34%15.35%11.08%8.43%9.84%8.84%8.35%9.62%

Financials

TSLX vs. RQI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
91.19B
55.28M
(TSLX) Total Revenue
(RQI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TSLX vs. RQI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
79.0%
Portfolio components
TSLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 91.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RQI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund reported a gross profit of 43.68M and revenue of 55.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

TSLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 91.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

RQI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund reported an operating income of -10.03M and revenue of 55.28M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.2%.

TSLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. reported a net income of 41.05B and revenue of 91.19B, resulting in a net margin of 45.0%.

RQI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund reported a net income of -27.67M and revenue of 55.28M, resulting in a net margin of -50.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSLX and RQI have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to RQI (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLX dropped -50.27% vs RQI's -91.59%.

RQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLX and RQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer