TSEM vs. NICE
TSEM (Tower Semiconductor Ltd) and NICE (NICE Ltd.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — TSEM in Semiconductors, NICE in Software - Application. Over the past 10 years, TSEM returned 34.52%/yr vs 4.08%/yr for NICE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSEM vs. NICE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSEM achieves a 106.13% return, which is significantly higher than NICE's -19.19% return. Over the past 10 years, TSEM has outperformed NICE with an annualized return of 34.52%, while NICE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.08% annualized return.
TSEM
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- 14.70%
- YTD
- 106.13%
- 6M
- 104.60%
- 1Y
- 502.39%
- 3Y*
- 83.63%
- 5Y*
- 55.36%
- 10Y*
- 34.52%
NICE
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- -19.19%
- 6M
- -13.59%
- 1Y
- -48.30%
- 3Y*
- -24.93%
- 5Y*
- -16.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.08%
TSEM vs. NICE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd | 106.13% | 127.96% | 68.77% | -29.35% | 8.87% | 53.68% | 7.32% | 63.23% | -56.75% | 79.09% |
NICE NICE Ltd. | -19.19% | -33.44% | -14.87% | 3.75% | -36.66% | 7.07% | 82.75% | 43.38% | 17.73% | 33.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSEM and NICE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 1996 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TSEM and NICE has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
TSEM:
$27.68B
NICE:
$5.54B
TSEM:
$2.15
NICE:
$8.49
TSEM:
112.35
NICE:
10.76
TSEM:
3.96
NICE:
0.33
TSEM:
17.00
NICE:
1.89
TSEM:
9.31
NICE:
1.51
TSEM:
$1.62B
NICE:
$3.01B
TSEM:
$401.63M
NICE:
$1.98B
TSEM:
$571.93M
NICE:
$841.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSEM vs. NICE — Risk / Return Rank
TSEM
NICE
TSEM vs. NICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM) and NICE Ltd. (NICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSEM | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 0.81 | +0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.24 | -0.94 | +21.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 72.71 | -1.50 | +74.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSEM | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.47 | -0.95 | +8.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | -0.42 | +1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.12 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.23 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
TSEM vs. NICE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSEM drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than NICE's maximum drawdown of -93.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSEM and NICE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSEM | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.75% | -93.23% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.04% | -51.56% | +26.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.78% | -66.98% | +20.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.39% | -72.58% | +17.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.28% | -72.58% | +10.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.54% | -71.00% | +11.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.41% | -35.17% | -50.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.95% | 32.15% | -25.20% |
Volatility
TSEM vs. NICE - Volatility Comparison
Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM) has a higher volatility of 31.39% compared to NICE Ltd. (NICE) at 12.47%. This indicates that TSEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSEM | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.39% | 12.47% | +18.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.84% | 41.62% | +13.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.98% | 50.86% | +17.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.01% | 39.81% | +7.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.46% | 33.23% | +10.23% |
Dividends
TSEM vs. NICE - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSEM nor NICE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICE NICE Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.76% | 0.91% |
TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TSEM vs. NICE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tower Semiconductor Ltd and NICE Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TSEM vs. NICE - Profitability Comparison
TSEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported a gross profit of 110.95M and revenue of 413.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.
NICE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a gross profit of 493.46M and revenue of 766.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.4%.
TSEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported an operating income of 64.57M and revenue of 413.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
NICE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NICE Ltd. reported an operating income of 126.41M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
TSEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported a net income of 65.03M and revenue of 413.63M, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.
NICE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a net income of 46.69M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSEM and NICE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSEM has higher volatility (31.39%) compared to NICE (12.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSEM dropped -99.75% vs NICE's -93.23%.
TSEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.47 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSEM and NICE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer