PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TROSX vs. WMFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TROSX vs. WMFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund (TROSX) and Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TROSX achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than WMFFX's 4.46% return. Over the past 10 years, TROSX has underperformed WMFFX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while WMFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


TROSX

1D
-2.48%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
6.73%
6M
9.34%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
15.40%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
8.87%

WMFFX

1D
-1.27%
1M
0.30%
YTD
4.46%
6M
4.89%
1Y
15.75%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TROSX vs. WMFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TROSX
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund
6.73%31.78%2.91%16.34%-15.42%12.24%9.24%22.91%-15.08%27.05%
WMFFX
Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2
4.46%17.42%19.24%16.96%-8.27%28.71%7.89%25.03%-5.98%20.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TROSX and WMFFX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2008

0.82

The correlation between TROSX and WMFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TROSX vs. WMFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TROSX
TROSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TROSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TROSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TROSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TROSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TROSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

WMFFX
WMFFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
WMFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
WMFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TROSX vs. WMFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund (TROSX) and Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TROSXWMFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.97

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

8.50

-2.01

TROSX vs. WMFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TROSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the WMFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TROSX and WMFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TROSXWMFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.58

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.82

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.78

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.60

-0.34

Drawdowns

TROSX vs. WMFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TROSX drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, which is greater than WMFFX's maximum drawdown of -47.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TROSX and WMFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TROSXWMFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.62%

-47.21%

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-8.36%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-14.64%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.45%

-18.53%

-10.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.34%

-34.63%

-1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.92%

-1.41%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.45%

-5.36%

-7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

1.93%

+1.43%

Volatility

TROSX vs. WMFFX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund (TROSX) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) at 2.54%. This indicates that TROSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TROSXWMFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

2.54%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

7.92%

+5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

10.40%

+5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

14.11%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

16.33%

+0.65%

TROSX vs. WMFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TROSX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than WMFFX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

TROSX vs. WMFFX - Dividend Comparison

TROSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than WMFFX's 9.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TROSX
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund
1.92%2.05%2.38%2.28%2.38%1.88%1.41%2.14%3.33%1.86%1.98%2.11%
WMFFX
Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2
9.87%10.28%10.27%5.92%6.53%6.24%3.26%6.33%4.59%7.43%6.56%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


TROSX and WMFFX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TROSX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to WMFFX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TROSX dropped -60.62% vs WMFFX's -47.21%.

WMFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TROSX and WMFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer