TRENT.NS vs. PAYTM.NS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TRENT.NS (Trent Limited) and PAYTM.NS (One97 Communications Limited) are both stocks. TRENT.NS operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while PAYTM.NS operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 3 years, TRENT.NS returned 38.71%/yr vs 14.00%/yr for PAYTM.NS. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TRENT.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in Trent Limited (TRENT.NS) and One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRENT.NS achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly higher than PAYTM.NS's -18.51% return.

TRENT.NS

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: -0.46%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: -26.24%
• 3Y*: 38.71%
• 5Y*: 38.03%
• 10Y*: 38.19%

PAYTM.NS

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -10.83%
• YTD: -18.51%
• 6M: -21.28%
• 1Y: 10.04%
• 3Y*: 14.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRENT.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TRENT.NS Trent Limited	-0.46%	-39.81%	133.11%	126.20%	27.03%	-5.85%
PAYTM.NS One97 Communications Limited	-18.51%	27.61%	60.18%	19.67%	-60.21%	-14.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TRENT.NS and PAYTM.NS is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2021	0.21

The correlation between TRENT.NS and PAYTM.NS shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TRENT.NS vs. PAYTM.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRENT.NS

TRENT.NS Risk / Return Rank: 18
TRENT.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
TRENT.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
TRENT.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 14
TRENT.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
TRENT.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

PAYTM.NS

PAYTM.NS Risk / Return Rank: 51
PAYTM.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PAYTM.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PAYTM.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PAYTM.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
PAYTM.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRENT.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trent Limited (TRENT.NS) and One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRENT.NS	PAYTM.NS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.71	0.36	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.86	0.75	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.09	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	0.42	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.80	1.04	-1.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRENT.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRENT.NS Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the PAYTM.NS Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRENT.NS and PAYTM.NS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRENT.NS	PAYTM.NS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.71	0.36	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	-0.16	+0.60

Drawdowns

TRENT.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRENT.NS drawdown since its inception was -87.98%, which is greater than PAYTM.NS's maximum drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRENT.NS and PAYTM.NS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRENT.NS	PAYTM.NS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.98%	-82.37%	-5.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.97%	-29.89%	-17.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.90%	-67.89%	+7.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.26%	-41.15%	-7.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.31%	-54.62%	+25.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.48%	12.17%	+16.31%

Volatility

TRENT.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trent Limited (TRENT.NS) is 7.60%, while One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS) has a volatility of 11.95%. This indicates that TRENT.NS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAYTM.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRENT.NS	PAYTM.NS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.60%	11.95%	-4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.68%	28.34%	-3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.42%	35.53%	-3.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.57%	51.76%	-17.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.00%	51.76%	-14.76%

Dividends

TRENT.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Dividend Comparison

TRENT.NS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while PAYTM.NS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAYTM.NS One97 Communications Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRENT.NS Trent Limited	0.08%	0.08%	0.03%	0.05%	0.08%	0.04%	0.10%	0.17%	0.21%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRENT.NS and PAYTM.NS in my portfolio?

TRENT.NS and PAYTM.NS have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.