TRAK vs. UEC
TRAK (Park City Group Inc) and UEC (Uranium Energy Corp.) are both stocks. TRAK operates in Software - Application (Technology), while UEC operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past year, TRAK returned -54.07% vs 101.12% for UEC. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRAK vs. UEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a -18.70% return, which is significantly lower than UEC's 7.96% return.
TRAK
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -18.70%
- 6M
- -25.66%
- 1Y
- -54.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UEC
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -16.82%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- -7.62%
- 1Y
- 101.12%
- 3Y*
- 59.63%
- 5Y*
- 31.89%
- 10Y*
- 28.85%
TRAK vs. UEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TRAK Park City Group Inc | -18.70% | -43.84% | 18.98% |
UEC Uranium Energy Corp. | 7.96% | 74.59% | -2.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRAK and UEC is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2024 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
TRAK:
$188.95M
UEC:
$6.10B
TRAK:
$104.56
UEC:
-$0.18
TRAK:
0.03
UEC:
290.85
TRAK:
0.00
UEC:
4.32
TRAK:
$5.90B
UEC:
$20.20M
TRAK:
$5.09B
UEC:
$5.72M
TRAK:
$1.63B
UEC:
-$104.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRAK vs. UEC — Risk / Return Rank
TRAK
UEC
TRAK vs. UEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRAK | UEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.23 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 2.49 | -3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 4.89 | -6.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRAK | UEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.26 | 1.34 | -2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.04 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
TRAK vs. UEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, smaller than the maximum UEC drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and UEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRAK | UEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.93% | -97.40% | +26.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.03% | -40.86% | -26.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.11% | -37.39% | -21.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.19% | -62.10% | +29.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.10% | 20.76% | +22.34% |
Volatility
TRAK vs. UEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) is 12.23%, while Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a volatility of 27.76%. This indicates that TRAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRAK | UEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.23% | 27.76% | -15.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.26% | 56.94% | -23.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.17% | 76.19% | -33.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.79% | 74.18% | -33.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.79% | 73.61% | -32.82% |
Dividends
TRAK vs. UEC - Dividend Comparison
TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while UEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TRAK Park City Group Inc | 0.78% | 0.62% | 0.16% |
UEC Uranium Energy Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRAK vs. UEC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park City Group Inc and Uranium Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TRAK and UEC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UEC has higher volatility (27.76%) compared to TRAK (12.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRAK dropped -70.93% vs UEC's -97.40%.
UEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRAK and UEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer