TRAK vs. TAYD
TRAK (Park City Group Inc) and TAYD (Taylor Devices, Inc.) are both stocks. TRAK operates in Software - Application (Technology), while TAYD operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past year, TRAK returned -54.07% vs 49.71% for TAYD. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRAK vs. TAYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a -18.70% return, which is significantly lower than TAYD's -6.24% return.
TRAK
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -18.70%
- 6M
- -25.66%
- 1Y
- -54.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAYD
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 49.71%
- 3Y*
- 40.58%
- 5Y*
- 35.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.58%
TRAK vs. TAYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TRAK Park City Group Inc | -18.70% | -43.84% | 18.98% |
TAYD Taylor Devices, Inc. | -6.24% | 40.46% | -5.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRAK and TAYD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2024 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
TRAK:
$104.56
TAYD:
$4.95
TRAK:
0.10
TAYD:
11.07
TRAK:
0.00
TAYD:
0.12
TRAK:
0.03
TAYD:
3.10
TRAK:
$5.90B
TAYD:
$37.08M
TRAK:
$5.09B
TAYD:
$21.95M
TRAK:
$1.63B
TAYD:
$13.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRAK vs. TAYD — Risk / Return Rank
TRAK
TAYD
TRAK vs. TAYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRAK | TAYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.19 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 1.11 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 2.56 | -3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRAK | TAYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.26 | 0.86 | -2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.13 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
TRAK vs. TAYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, roughly equal to the maximum TAYD drawdown of -74.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and TAYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRAK | TAYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.93% | -74.52% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.03% | -45.06% | -21.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -52.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.11% | -39.07% | -20.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.19% | -37.29% | +5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.10% | 19.47% | +23.63% |
Volatility
TRAK vs. TAYD - Volatility Comparison
Park City Group Inc (TRAK) has a higher volatility of 12.23% compared to Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) at 10.68%. This indicates that TRAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRAK | TAYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.23% | 10.68% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.26% | 45.11% | -11.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.17% | 58.53% | -15.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.79% | 53.12% | -12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.79% | 46.24% | -5.45% |
Dividends
TRAK vs. TAYD - Dividend Comparison
TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while TAYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TAYD Taylor Devices, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRAK Park City Group Inc | 0.78% | 0.62% | 0.16% |
Financials
TRAK vs. TAYD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park City Group Inc and Taylor Devices, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TRAK and TAYD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRAK has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to TAYD (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRAK dropped -70.93% vs TAYD's -74.52%.
TAYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRAK and TAYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer