TRAK vs. NEOV

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

TRAK (Park City Group Inc) and NEOV (NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. TRAK operates in Software - Application (Technology), while NEOV operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past year, TRAK returned -54.07% vs -35.62% for NEOV. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TRAK vs. NEOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a -18.70% return, which is significantly higher than NEOV's -35.20% return.

TRAK

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: -18.70%
• 6M: -25.66%
• 1Y: -54.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEOV

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -25.38%
• YTD: -35.20%
• 6M: -43.39%
• 1Y: -35.62%
• 3Y*: -13.27%
• 5Y*: -22.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRAK vs. NEOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TRAK Park City Group Inc	-18.70%	-43.84%	19.37%
NEOV NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock	-35.20%	-41.65%	64.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TRAK and NEOV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024	0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap TRAK : $188.95M NEOV : $79.17M
EPS TRAK : $104.56 NEOV : -$0.32
PS Ratio TRAK : 0.03 NEOV : 4.40
PB Ratio TRAK : 0.00 NEOV : 3.57
Total Revenue (TTM) TRAK : $5.90B NEOV : $16.05M
Gross Profit (TTM) TRAK : $5.09B NEOV : $3.74M
EBITDA (TTM) TRAK : $1.63B NEOV : -$9.07M

Return for Risk

TRAK vs. NEOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRAK

TRAK Risk / Return Rank: 6
TRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
TRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
TRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 13

NEOV

NEOV Risk / Return Rank: 31
NEOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
NEOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
NEOV Omega Ratio Rank: 40
NEOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
NEOV Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRAK vs. NEOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRAK	NEOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.26	-0.29	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.15	0.37	-2.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.05	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	-0.49	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	-1.00	-0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRAK vs. NEOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRAK Sharpe Ratio is -1.26, which is lower than the NEOV Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRAK and NEOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRAK	NEOV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.26	-0.29	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.76	0.08	-0.84

Drawdowns

TRAK vs. NEOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, smaller than the maximum NEOV drawdown of -90.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and NEOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRAK	NEOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.93%	-90.38%	+19.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.03%	-73.60%	+6.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.32%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-90.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.11%	-72.52%	+13.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.19%	-38.92%	+6.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.10%	35.68%	+7.42%

Volatility

TRAK vs. NEOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) is 12.23%, while NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV) has a volatility of 71.79%. This indicates that TRAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRAK	NEOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.23%	71.79%	-59.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.26%	102.83%	-69.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.17%	121.65%	-78.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.79%	93.71%	-52.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.79%	86.56%	-45.77%

Dividends

TRAK vs. NEOV - Dividend Comparison

TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while NEOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NEOV NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRAK Park City Group Inc	0.78%	0.62%	0.16%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRAK and NEOV in my portfolio?

TRAK and NEOV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRAK or NEOV?

NEOV has higher volatility (71.79%) compared to TRAK (12.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRAK dropped -70.93% vs NEOV's -90.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.