TRAK vs. MTN
TRAK (Park City Group Inc) and MTN (Vail Resorts, Inc.) are both stocks. TRAK operates in Software - Application (Technology), while MTN operates in Resorts & Casinos (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, TRAK returned -54.07% vs -2.97% for MTN. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRAK vs. MTN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a -18.70% return, which is significantly lower than MTN's 5.09% return.
TRAK
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -18.70%
- 6M
- -25.66%
- 1Y
- -54.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTN
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 5.09%
- 6M
- -1.45%
- 1Y
- -2.97%
- 3Y*
- -12.71%
- 5Y*
- -12.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
TRAK vs. MTN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TRAK Park City Group Inc | -18.70% | -43.84% | 19.37% |
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 5.09% | -24.88% | 10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRAK and MTN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
TRAK:
$104.56
MTN:
$5.62
TRAK:
0.10
MTN:
24.41
TRAK:
0.00
MTN:
0.60
TRAK:
0.03
MTN:
1.31
TRAK:
$5.90B
MTN:
$2.83B
TRAK:
$5.09B
MTN:
$2.12B
TRAK:
$1.63B
MTN:
$499.82M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRAK vs. MTN — Risk / Return Rank
TRAK
MTN
TRAK vs. MTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRAK | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.01 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | -0.11 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | -0.20 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRAK | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.26 | -0.09 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.21 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
TRAK vs. MTN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, smaller than the maximum MTN drawdown of -77.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and MTN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRAK | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.93% | -77.54% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.03% | -26.40% | -40.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.11% | -55.24% | -3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.19% | -26.12% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.10% | 14.74% | +28.36% |
Volatility
TRAK vs. MTN - Volatility Comparison
Park City Group Inc (TRAK) has a higher volatility of 12.23% compared to Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) at 6.59%. This indicates that TRAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRAK | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.23% | 6.59% | +5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.26% | 26.27% | +6.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.17% | 33.65% | +9.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.79% | 31.70% | +9.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.79% | 32.29% | +8.50% |
Dividends
TRAK vs. MTN - Dividend Comparison
TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than MTN's 6.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 6.47% | 6.69% | 4.74% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 1.98% | 2.01% | 1.95% |
TRAK Park City Group Inc | 0.78% | 0.62% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRAK vs. MTN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park City Group Inc and Vail Resorts, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRAK vs. MTN - Profitability Comparison
TRAK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a gross profit of 5.08B and revenue of 5.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.
MTN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.
TRAK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported an operating income of 2.25B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.3%.
MTN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 494.13M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.
TRAK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a net income of 1.99B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in a net margin of 33.8%.
MTN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 314.44M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRAK and MTN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRAK has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to MTN (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRAK dropped -70.93% vs MTN's -77.54%.
MTN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRAK and MTN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer