PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQQ vs. LQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQQ vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 44.91% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed LQD with an annualized return of 43.95%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.41% annualized return.


TQQQ

1D
4.41%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
44.91%
6M
37.12%
1Y
106.99%
3Y*
62.78%
5Y*
24.89%
10Y*
43.95%

LQD

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
5.73%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-0.28%
10Y*
2.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
44.91%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
-0.06%7.90%0.86%9.40%-17.92%-1.84%10.97%17.37%-3.79%7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and LQD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.11

Over the past year, TQQQ and LQD have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

LQD
LQD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQQLQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

1.72

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

4.88

+4.57

TQQQ vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and LQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQQLQDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.08

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

-0.03

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.28

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.54

+0.18

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and LQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQQLQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-24.95%

-56.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

-3.34%

-33.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

-8.43%

-49.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

-24.95%

-56.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

-24.95%

-56.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.55%

-4.21%

-8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-3.99%

-14.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.36%

1.18%

+10.18%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 20.84% compared to iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) at 1.62%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQQLQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.84%

1.62%

+19.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.54%

3.94%

+35.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.94%

5.32%

+44.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.84%

8.65%

+58.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.15%

8.68%

+57.47%

TQQQ vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQQ vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than LQD's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.59%4.48%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.41%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQQQ and LQD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.84%) compared to LQD (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs LQD's -24.95%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 43.95% vs 2.41% for LQD. On fees, LQD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, LQD has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 43.95% return vs 2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LQD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

LQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 0.41% for TQQQ.

TQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while LQD is Corporate Bonds. TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while LQD tracks iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.15% for LQD.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQQ and LQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer