TQQQ vs. EFO
TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%) while EFO tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ returned 43.95%/yr vs 10.47%/yr for EFO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
TQQQ vs. EFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 44.91% return, which is significantly higher than EFO's 9.90% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed EFO with an annualized return of 43.95%, while EFO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.47% annualized return.
TQQQ
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 44.91%
- 6M
- 37.12%
- 1Y
- 106.99%
- 3Y*
- 62.78%
- 5Y*
- 24.89%
- 10Y*
- 43.95%
EFO
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
TQQQ vs. EFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 44.91% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 9.90% | 58.51% | -2.15% | 25.77% | -33.62% | 19.38% | 2.29% | 40.93% | -30.91% | 51.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQQ and EFO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.60 |
The correlation between TQQQ and EFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
TQQQ vs. EFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TQQQ
EFO
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
TQQQ
EFO
-
Communication Services
TQQQ
EFO
-
Consumer Cyclical
TQQQ
EFO
-
Consumer Defensive
TQQQ
EFO
-
Healthcare
TQQQ
EFO
-
Industrials
TQQQ
EFO
-
Utilities
TQQQ
EFO
-
Basic Materials
TQQQ
EFO
-
Energy
TQQQ
EFO
-
Financial Services
TQQQ
EFO
Real Estate
TQQQ
EFO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQQ vs. EFO — Risk / Return Rank
TQQQ
EFO
TQQQ vs. EFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TQQQ | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.18 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 1.32 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 4.54 | +4.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TQQQ | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 0.94 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.20 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.31 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.23 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
TQQQ vs. EFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than EFO's maximum drawdown of -63.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and EFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQQ | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.66% | -63.52% | -18.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.97% | -22.18% | -14.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.04% | -26.85% | -31.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.66% | -53.95% | -27.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.66% | -63.52% | -18.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.55% | -8.03% | -4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -18.66% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.36% | 6.45% | +4.91% |
Volatility
TQQQ vs. EFO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 20.84% compared to ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) at 9.48%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQQ | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.84% | 9.48% | +11.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.54% | 25.91% | +13.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.94% | 31.13% | +18.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.84% | 33.08% | +33.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.15% | 34.14% | +32.01% |
TQQQ vs. EFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TQQQ and EFO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
TQQQ vs. EFO - Dividend Comparison
TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than EFO's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.58% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.41% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQQQ and EFO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (20.84%) compared to EFO (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs EFO's -63.52%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 43.95% vs 10.47% for EFO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EFO has been the lower-risk option at 9.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 43.95% return vs 10.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TQQQ and EFO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.41% for TQQQ.
TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while EFO tracks MSCI EAFE Index (200%).
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TQQQ and EFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer