PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPR vs. CM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TPR vs. CM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TPR is traded in USD, while CM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CM.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPR achieves a 10.89% return, which is significantly lower than CM.TO's 21.72% return. Over the past 10 years, TPR has underperformed CM.TO with an annualized return of 17.11%, while CM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.63% annualized return.


TPR

1D
0.57%
1M
5.86%
YTD
10.89%
6M
20.82%
1Y
80.77%
3Y*
52.54%
5Y*
29.87%
10Y*
17.11%

CM.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
21.72%
6M
23.40%
1Y
64.82%
3Y*
43.58%
5Y*
19.52%
10Y*
19.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPR vs. CM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
10.89%98.73%82.80%0.16%-3.32%32.29%16.86%-15.97%-22.09%30.48%
CM.TO
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
21.72%49.12%37.89%26.85%-25.60%47.82%16.65%23.27%-15.72%31.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TPR and CM.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.33

The correlation between TPR and CM.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TPR:

$29.35B

CM.TO:

CA$141.37B

EPS

TPR:

$3.15

CM.TO:

CA$10.53

PE Ratio

TPR:

44.72

CM.TO:

14.52

PS Ratio

TPR:

3.78

CM.TO:

2.68

PB Ratio

TPR:

43.01

CM.TO:

2.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

TPR:

$7.85B

CM.TO:

CA$53.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TPR:

$5.98B

CM.TO:

CA$28.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

TPR:

$1.06B

CM.TO:

CA$13.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPR vs. CM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPR
TPR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CM.TO
CM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPR vs. CM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPRCM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.63

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

6.16

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.73

24.45

-13.72

TPR vs. CM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the CM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPR and CM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPRCM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

3.66

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

1.01

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.93

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.60

-0.16

Drawdowns

TPR vs. CM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPR drawdown since its inception was -82.55%, which is greater than CM.TO's maximum drawdown of -69.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPR and CM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPRCM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.55%

-69.60%

-12.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.21%

-10.57%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.54%

-19.54%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.87%

-41.24%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.06%

-44.98%

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.72%

-5.83%

-5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.74%

-12.48%

-15.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.55%

2.66%

+4.89%

Volatility

TPR vs. CM.TO - Volatility Comparison

Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) at 7.79%. This indicates that TPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPRCM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.83%

7.79%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.95%

14.98%

+12.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.87%

17.85%

+23.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.24%

19.46%

+20.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.23%

21.23%

+23.00%

Dividends

TPR vs. CM.TO - Dividend Comparison

TPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than CM.TO's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CM.TO
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.67%3.20%4.04%5.47%7.52%8.13%10.74%10.51%10.58%8.39%8.84%9.69%
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
1.14%1.17%2.14%3.53%2.89%1.23%1.09%5.01%3.00%3.06%3.85%4.13%

Financials

TPR vs. CM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tapestry, Inc. and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.92B
15.23B
(TPR) Total Revenue
(CM.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TPR values in USD, CM.TO values in CAD

TPR vs. CM.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tapestry, Inc. and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
76.9%
48.4%
Portfolio components
TPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.48B and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

CM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.

TPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported an operating income of 427.50M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

CM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

TPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a net income of 343.80M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.

CM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.23B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPR and CM.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPR and CM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer