TMUS vs. FIVA
TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) is a stock, while FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index. Over the past 5 years, TMUS returned 4.85%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for FIVA. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMUS vs. FIVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -11.22% return, which is significantly lower than FIVA's 11.65% return.
TMUS
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- YTD
- -11.22%
- 6M
- -11.83%
- 1Y
- -26.06%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
FIVA
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 6M
- 16.62%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- —
TMUS vs. FIVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -11.22% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | -0.24% |
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 11.65% | 45.83% | 2.53% | 20.38% | -10.37% | 15.90% | -1.78% | 19.78% | -18.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMUS and FIVA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018 | 0.30 |
The correlation between TMUS and FIVA shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMUS vs. FIVA — Risk / Return Rank
TMUS
FIVA
TMUS vs. FIVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMUS | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.38 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 2.89 | -3.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 11.27 | -12.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMUS | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 2.18 | -3.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.75 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.48 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
TMUS vs. FIVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than FIVA's maximum drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and FIVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMUS | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.29% | -39.76% | -46.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.37% | -11.71% | -18.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.65% | -14.77% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.65% | -28.70% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.12% | -1.89% | -31.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -7.77% | -18.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.64% | 3.00% | +14.64% |
Volatility
TMUS vs. FIVA - Volatility Comparison
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) at 4.87%. This indicates that TMUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMUS | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 4.87% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.14% | 12.80% | +6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.04% | 15.51% | +9.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.86% | 16.39% | +7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.08% | 17.92% | +8.16% |
Dividends
TMUS vs. FIVA - Dividend Comparison
TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than FIVA's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 2.55% | 2.68% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.21% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMUS and FIVA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMUS has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to FIVA (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs FIVA's -39.76%.
FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMUS and FIVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer