TLTW vs. CGCP
TLTW (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF) and CGCP (Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD), while CGCP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group. TLTW is passively managed, while CGCP is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TLTW returned 0.58%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for CGCP. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TLTW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for CGCP.
Performance
TLTW vs. CGCP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTW achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than CGCP's 0.02% return.
TLTW
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- 0.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGCP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 5.60%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTW vs. CGCP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 0.79% | 11.36% | -2.18% | 0.73% | -11.14% |
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 0.02% | 7.35% | 2.95% | 7.17% | -3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTW and CGCP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between TLTW and CGCP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTW vs. CGCP — Risk / Return Rank
TLTW
CGCP
TLTW vs. CGCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) and Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLTW | CGCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 2.17 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | 7.06 | -2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLTW | CGCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.55 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.25 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
TLTW vs. CGCP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTW drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, which is greater than CGCP's maximum drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTW and CGCP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTW | CGCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -15.06% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -2.59% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.19% | -5.37% | -11.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -1.47% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -4.92% | -3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 0.80% | +1.22% |
Volatility
TLTW vs. CGCP - Volatility Comparison
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) at 1.28%. This indicates that TLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTW | CGCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 1.28% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.79% | 2.75% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.64% | 3.64% | +4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.38% | 6.35% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.38% | 6.35% | +5.03% |
TLTW vs. CGCP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCP's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTW vs. CGCP - Dividend Comparison
TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.80%, more than CGCP's 5.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 5.17% | 5.10% | 5.17% | 4.98% | 2.96% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 11.80% | 14.82% | 14.47% | 19.59% | 8.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTW and CGCP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLTW has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to CGCP (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTW dropped -18.61% vs CGCP's -15.06%.
On 3-year performance, CGCP leads with 5.00% vs 0.58% for TLTW. On fees, CGCP is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, CGCP has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGCP has performed better with a 5.00% return vs 0.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGCP is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TLTW.
TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.80%, compared with 5.17% for CGCP.
TLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while CGCP is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TLTW and 0.34% for CGCP.
CGCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLTW and CGCP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer