PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TLT vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TLT vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TLT returned -1.85%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for NOBL. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. TLT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

TLT vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, TLT has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of -1.85%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.58% annualized return.

TLT

1D
-0.52%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
-1.08%
6M
-1.51%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
-2.05%
5Y*
-6.70%
10Y*
-1.85%

NOBL

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.13%
YTD
4.55%
6M
6.02%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
8.03%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLT vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF		-1.08%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF		4.55%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TLT and NOBL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013

-0.12

The correlation between TLT and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Often compared with TLT:
TLT vs. SPYTLT vs. IEFTLT vs. TMFTLT vs. BNDTLT vs. VGLTTLT vs. TLTWTLT vs. EDV
Often compared with NOBL:
NOBL vs. SCHDNOBL vs. SPYNOBL vs. VIGNOBL vs. DGRONOBL vs. SDYNOBL vs. VOONOBL vs. KNG

Return for Risk

TLT vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLT vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TLTNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.38
0.88

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.62
1.36

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.15

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

1.10

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.19

2.83

-1.64

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLT vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLT and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TLTNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

0.88

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.38

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

0.58

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.65

-0.40

Drawdowns

TLT vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and NOBL.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TLTNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.35%

-35.43%

-12.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-9.11%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-15.36%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-17.92%

-25.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

-35.43%

-12.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.92%

-5.05%

-35.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-3.48%

-10.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

3.54%

-0.46%

Volatility

TLT vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.49%. This indicates that TLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TLTNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

2.49%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

8.08%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.60%

11.39%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

14.39%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

16.61%

-1.70%

TLT vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLT vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than NOBL's 2.10% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF		2.10%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF		4.63%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

TLT and NOBL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLT has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to NOBL (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLT dropped -48.35% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.58% vs -1.85% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.58% return vs -1.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 2.10% for NOBL.

TLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while NOBL is Dividend. TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLT and 0.35% for NOBL.

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLT and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer