TIP vs. FSZ
TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) and FSZ (First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index, while FSZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TIP returned 2.45%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for FSZ. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TIP charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FSZ.
Performance
TIP vs. FSZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIP achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than FSZ's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, TIP has underperformed FSZ with an annualized return of 2.45%, while FSZ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.55% annualized return.
TIP
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.88%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
FSZ
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 7.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
TIP vs. FSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 0.95% | 6.77% | 1.65% | 3.80% | -12.26% | 5.68% | 10.84% | 8.35% | -1.42% | 2.92% |
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund | 1.30% | 30.10% | -1.85% | 21.30% | -20.12% | 20.18% | 13.83% | 25.88% | -15.22% | 31.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIP and FSZ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, TIP and FSZ have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIP vs. FSZ — Risk / Return Rank
TIP
FSZ
TIP vs. FSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIP | FSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.10 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 0.76 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 1.88 | +5.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIP | FSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 0.55 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.29 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.51 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.51 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
TIP vs. FSZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum FSZ drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP and FSZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIP | FSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.57% | -33.97% | +19.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.98% | -10.39% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.54% | -13.93% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.51% | -33.96% | +19.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.51% | -33.97% | +19.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -5.80% | +4.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.43% | -6.99% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 4.18% | -3.53% |
Volatility
TIP vs. FSZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) is 1.01%, while First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that TIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIP | FSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 4.27% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 10.87% | -8.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 14.33% | -10.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 19.35% | -13.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 18.96% | -13.22% |
TIP vs. FSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FSZ's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIP vs. FSZ - Dividend Comparison
TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than FSZ's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund | 2.41% | 1.80% | 1.80% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 1.62% | 1.53% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 1.49% | 1.93% | 1.08% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 3.78% | 3.46% | 2.52% | 2.73% | 6.96% | 4.28% | 1.17% | 1.75% | 2.71% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIP and FSZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSZ has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to TIP (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIP dropped -14.57% vs FSZ's -33.97%.
On 10-year performance, FSZ leads with 9.55% vs 2.45% for TIP. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FSZ has performed better with a 9.55% return vs 2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TIP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.
TIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 2.41% for FSZ.
TIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while FSZ is Europe Equities. TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index, while FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TIP and 0.80% for FSZ.
TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIP and FSZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer