TIGR vs. AU
TIGR (UP Fintech Holding Limited) and AU (AngloGold Ashanti Limited) are both stocks. TIGR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while AU operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, TIGR returned -29.56%/yr vs 34.89%/yr for AU. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TIGR vs. AU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIGR achieves a -51.15% return, which is significantly lower than AU's 1.94% return.
TIGR
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- -27.71%
- YTD
- -51.15%
- 6M
- -49.84%
- 1Y
- -44.67%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- -29.56%
- 10Y*
- —
AU
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -20.12%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 93.94%
- 3Y*
- 56.64%
- 5Y*
- 34.89%
- 10Y*
- 19.78%
TIGR vs. AU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | -51.15% | 47.99% | 46.15% | 29.62% | -30.55% | -38.16% | 123.66% | -67.49% |
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited | 1.94% | 288.18% | 25.43% | -2.68% | -5.09% | -4.87% | 1.90% | 62.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIGR and AU is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.11 |
The correlation between TIGR and AU shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TIGR:
$831.15M
AU:
$42.65B
TIGR:
$0.62
AU:
$6.85
TIGR:
7.59
AU:
12.32
TIGR:
0.09
AU:
0.14
TIGR:
1.34
AU:
3.83
TIGR:
0.99
AU:
5.00
TIGR:
$645.56M
AU:
$11.17B
TIGR:
$533.82M
AU:
$5.82B
TIGR:
$236.90M
AU:
$5.58B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIGR vs. AU — Risk / Return Rank
TIGR
AU
TIGR vs. AU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) and AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIGR | AU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.27 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 2.58 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 7.04 | -8.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIGR | AU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.67 | 1.64 | -2.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.72 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.14 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
TIGR vs. AU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIGR drawdown since its inception was -93.65%, roughly equal to the maximum AU drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGR and AU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIGR | AU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.65% | -90.12% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.44% | -36.59% | -29.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.44% | -38.71% | -27.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.04% | -51.75% | -40.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.28% | -32.22% | -55.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.94% | -46.08% | -31.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.03% | 13.40% | +19.63% |
Volatility
TIGR vs. AU - Volatility Comparison
UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) has a higher volatility of 35.71% compared to AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU) at 20.03%. This indicates that TIGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIGR | AU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.71% | 20.03% | +15.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.46% | 45.74% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.34% | 57.81% | +9.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.00% | 48.98% | +34.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.75% | 49.72% | +40.03% |
Dividends
TIGR vs. AU - Dividend Comparison
TIGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited | 5.45% | 2.96% | 1.78% | 1.14% | 2.26% | 2.58% | 0.49% | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.93% |
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TIGR vs. AU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UP Fintech Holding Limited and AngloGold Ashanti Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TIGR vs. AU - Profitability Comparison
TIGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 147.59M and revenue of 155.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.0%.
AU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported a gross profit of 1.88B and revenue of 3.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.
TIGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported an operating income of 65.89M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.
AU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported an operating income of 1.84B and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.8%.
TIGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a net income of -26.92M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.
AU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported a net income of 1.28B and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TIGR and AU have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIGR has higher volatility (35.71%) compared to AU (20.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIGR dropped -93.65% vs AU's -90.12%.
AU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIGR and AU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer