PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFLO vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFLO vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFLO achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 3.70% return. Over the past 10 years, TFLO has underperformed UUP with an annualized return of 2.37%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.19% annualized return.


TFLO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.92%
1Y
4.01%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
2.37%

UUP

1D
0.04%
1M
2.52%
YTD
3.70%
6M
3.08%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
3.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFLO vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.65%4.22%5.34%5.12%1.99%-0.02%0.43%2.04%1.76%1.01%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.70%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TFLO and UUP is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFLO vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFLO vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFLOUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+13.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+50.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

14.07

1.16

+12.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

203.31

1.55

+201.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

831.80

4.13

+827.67

TFLO vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFLO Sharpe Ratio is 14.21, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFLO and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFLOUUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.21

0.93

+13.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

10.35

0.84

+9.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

5.23

0.46

+4.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.20

+0.78

Drawdowns

TFLO vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFLO drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLO and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFLOUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-22.19%

+17.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-3.65%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.04%

-10.05%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.13%

-10.37%

+10.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.16%

-14.24%

+14.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.89%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-8.91%

+8.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

1.37%

-1.37%

Volatility

TFLO vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) is 0.07%, while Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that TFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFLOUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

1.23%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.20%

4.25%

-4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28%

6.09%

-5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.35%

7.22%

-6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.46%

6.96%

-6.50%

TFLO vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFLO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFLO vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

TFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than UUP's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.90%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.31%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFLO and UUP have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UUP has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to TFLO (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFLO dropped -5.01% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 10-year performance, UUP leads with 3.19% vs 2.37% for TFLO. On fees, TFLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TFLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UUP has performed better with a 3.19% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TFLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

TFLO has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.31% for UUP.

TFLO is categorized as Government Bonds, while UUP is Currency. TFLO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TFLO and 0.75% for UUP.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.21 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFLO and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer