PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIV vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 22.19% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 44.91% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 18.57%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 43.95% annualized return.


TDIV

1D
0.86%
1M
4.45%
YTD
22.19%
6M
18.19%
1Y
42.39%
3Y*
30.27%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
18.57%

TQQQ

1D
4.41%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
44.91%
6M
37.12%
1Y
106.99%
3Y*
62.78%
5Y*
24.89%
10Y*
43.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
22.19%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
44.91%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and TQQQ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2012

0.87

The correlation between TDIV and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

TDIV vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDIV
TQQQ

Technology

85.0%
53.8%

Communication Services

13.4%
15.8%

Industrials

1.6%
2.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

TDIV
85.0%
TQQQ
53.8%

Communication Services

TDIV
13.4%
TQQQ
15.8%

Industrials

TDIV
1.6%
TQQQ
2.8%

Basic Materials

TDIV

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TDIV

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

TDIV

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

TDIV

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

TDIV

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

TDIV

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

TDIV

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

TDIV

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIV vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDIVTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

2.91

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

9.45

+2.60

TDIV vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDIVTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.16

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.37

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.67

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.72

+0.13

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIVTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-81.66%

+49.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-36.97%

+26.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

-58.04%

+35.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-81.66%

+49.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

-81.66%

+49.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.10%

-12.55%

+4.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-18.52%

+13.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

11.36%

-7.83%

Volatility

TDIV vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) is 9.66%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.84%. This indicates that TDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIVTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

20.84%

-11.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.31%

39.54%

-24.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.51%

49.94%

-30.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

66.84%

-45.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

66.15%

-45.20%

TDIV vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDIV vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than TQQQ's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.19%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.41%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIV and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.84%) compared to TDIV (9.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 43.95% vs 18.57% for TDIV. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDIV has been the lower-risk option at 9.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 43.95% return vs 18.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.41% for TQQQ.

TDIV is categorized as Technology Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer