PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV.AS vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIV.AS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TDIV.AS is traded in EUR, while SMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV.AS achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 61.29% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV.AS has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 12.02%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 35.93% annualized return.


TDIV.AS

1D
0.25%
1M
1.38%
YTD
9.89%
6M
12.76%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
12.02%

SMH

1D
0.00%
1M
2.87%
YTD
61.29%
6M
56.63%
1Y
123.62%
3Y*
54.25%
5Y*
38.07%
10Y*
35.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV.AS vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
9.89%24.40%15.98%10.91%16.18%27.85%-10.17%20.97%-7.12%2.88%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
61.29%31.47%48.28%68.18%-29.41%52.76%42.71%68.17%-4.78%21.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV.AS and SMH is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2016

0.28

The correlation between TDIV.AS and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIV.AS vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV.AS
TDIV.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV.AS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDIV.ASSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.57

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.19

10.07

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.93

34.13

-14.20

TDIV.AS vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV.AS and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDIV.ASSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

3.93

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.43

1.11

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

1.11

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.77

+0.07

Drawdowns

TDIV.AS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.06%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -56.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV.AS and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIV.ASSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.06%

-56.36%

+20.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-12.35%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-36.90%

+21.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

-36.90%

+21.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

-36.90%

+0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-10.09%

+8.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-11.17%

+7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

3.64%

-2.38%

Volatility

TDIV.AS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) is 2.38%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 13.88%. This indicates that TDIV.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIV.ASSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

13.88%

-11.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

25.25%

-18.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

31.71%

-22.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.07%

34.50%

-22.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.31%

32.58%

-18.27%

TDIV.AS vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV.AS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDIV.AS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

TDIV.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.19%3.58%4.19%4.98%4.55%3.98%4.12%4.40%4.93%3.95%1.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIV.AS and SMH have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDIV.AS.

TDIV.AS is categorized as Global Equity Income, while SMH is Semiconductors. TDIV.AS tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TDIV.AS and 0.35% for SMH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV.AS and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer